%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR042+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 23.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query242,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X2,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query242) ).
fof(ax4_186533,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x28_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_186533) ).
fof(ax4_540068,axiom,
! [X23,X27] :
( borderson(X23,X27)
=> borderson(X27,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540068) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X2,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query242]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x28_y64)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_186533])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ~ borderson(X30,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X35,X36] :
( borderson(X36,X35)
| ~ borderson(X35,X36) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540068])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x28_y64) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x28_y64),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR042+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.38 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:39 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/23.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/23.45 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/23.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % new_ho_10 with pid 3523497 completed with status 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/23.45 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/23.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/23.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/23.45 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.45 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3523660 completed with status 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/23.45 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/23.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/23.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/23.45 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.45 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.17/23.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/23.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.212 s
% 0.17/23.45
% 0.17/23.45 % Proof found!
% 0.17/23.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/23.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/23.45 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.17/23.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539723
% 0.17/23.45 % Initial clauses : 528
% 0.17/23.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 528
% 0.17/23.45 % Processed clauses : 583
% 0.17/23.45 % ...of these trivial : 45
% 0.17/23.45 % ...subsumed : 15
% 0.17/23.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 523
% 0.17/23.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.17/23.45 % Backward-rewritten : 26
% 0.17/23.45 % Generated clauses : 542
% 0.17/23.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 380
% 0.17/23.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Paramodulations : 542
% 0.17/23.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Total rewrite steps : 219
% 0.17/23.45 % ...of those cached : 151
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 496
% 0.17/23.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 360
% 0.17/23.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Negative unit clauses : 32
% 0.17/23.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 104
% 0.17/23.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 325
% 0.17/23.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 436
% 0.17/23.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 0.17/23.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1703
% 0.17/23.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1433
% 0.17/23.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.17/23.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1272
% 0.17/23.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 35
% 0.17/23.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 27
% 0.17/23.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/23.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3697474
% 0.17/23.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173232
% 0.17/23.45
% 0.17/23.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/23.45 % User time : 3.136 s
% 0.17/23.45 % System time : 1.493 s
% 0.17/23.45 % Total time : 4.629 s
% 0.17/23.45 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 0.17/23.45
% 0.17/23.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/23.45 % User time : 15.717 s
% 0.17/23.45 % System time : 2.429 s
% 0.17/23.45 % Total time : 18.146 s
% 0.17/23.45 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.17/23.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------