%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR042+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 194.05s 132.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 194.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query292,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X2,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query292) ).
fof(ax5_1888563,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y63,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1888563) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X2,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query292]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y63,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1888563])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X34] :
( ~ borderson(X34,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y63,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR042+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/5.68 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.19/5.68 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/5.68 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/5.68 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/5.68 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/5.68 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/5.68 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/5.68 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:20 UTC 2026
% 0.19/5.69 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/5.69 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/5.76 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/5.76 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 194.05/132.30 % Version: 3.5.1
% 194.05/132.30 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 194.05/132.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 198 seconds (1584 total)
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting new_ho_10 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting sh3 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2140520 completed with status 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 194.05/132.30 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 194.05/132.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 198 seconds (1584 total)
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting new_ho_10 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting sh3 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 194.05/132.30 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 194.05/132.30 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 194.05/132.30 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 378 seconds (378 total)
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 38s (1) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2140677 completed with status 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 194.05/132.30 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 194.05/132.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 198 seconds (1584 total)
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting new_ho_10 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting sh3 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 396s (2) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 194.05/132.30 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 194.05/132.30 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 194.05/132.30 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 378 seconds (378 total)
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 38s (1) cores
% 194.05/132.30 % Preprocessing time : 1.290 s
% 194.05/132.30 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 194.05/132.30
% 194.05/132.30 % Proof found!
% 194.05/132.30 % SZS status Theorem
% 194.05/132.30 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 194.05/132.30 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 194.05/132.30 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3329207
% 194.05/132.30 % Initial clauses : 12772
% 194.05/132.30 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 194.05/132.30 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12770
% 194.05/132.30 % Processed clauses : 92
% 194.05/132.30 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % ...subsumed : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % ...remaining for further processing : 91
% 194.05/132.30 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Generated clauses : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Paramodulations : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Factorizations : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % NegExts : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 194.05/132.30 % ...of those cached : 2
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional check models : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 194.05/132.30 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 194.05/132.30 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 194.05/132.30 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 194.05/132.30 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 194.05/132.30 % Current number of processed clauses : 91
% 194.05/132.30 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 30
% 194.05/132.30 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Negative unit clauses : 61
% 194.05/132.30 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12678
% 194.05/132.30 % ...number of literals in the above : 16887
% 194.05/132.30 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1710
% 194.05/132.30 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Condensation attempts : 92
% 194.05/132.30 % Condensation successes : 0
% 194.05/132.30 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22403329
% 194.05/132.30 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10478243
% 194.05/132.30
% 194.05/132.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 194.05/132.30 % User time : 15.971 s
% 194.05/132.30 % System time : 4.611 s
% 194.05/132.30 % Total time : 20.583 s
% 194.05/132.30 % Maximum resident set size: 5020612 pages
% 194.05/132.30
% 194.05/132.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 194.05/132.30 % User time : 116.679 s
% 194.05/132.30 % System time : 9.346 s
% 194.05/132.30 % Total time : 126.025 s
% 194.05/132.30 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 194.05/132.30 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------