%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : CSR043+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:43 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 4.79s 1.33s % Output : Proof 7.88s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.10 % Problem : CSR043+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % 0.00/0.10 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 10:50:15 EDT 2023 % 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime : % 0.15/0.52 ________ _____ % 0.15/0.52 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.15/0.52 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.15/0.52 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.15/0.52 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.15/0.52 (2023-06-19) % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.15/0.52 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.15/0.52 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.15/0.52 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.15/0.53 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.15/0.55 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.15/0.55 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.15/0.55 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.15/0.55 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.15/0.55 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.15/0.55 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.15/0.55 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.85/1.00 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.85/1.00 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 3.04/1.04 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 3.04/1.04 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.04/1.04 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.04/1.04 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.04/1.04 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 4.79/1.30 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.79/1.31 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.79/1.33 Prover 2: proved (785ms) % 4.79/1.33 % 4.79/1.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.79/1.33 % 4.79/1.33 Prover 5: proved (783ms) % 4.79/1.33 % 4.79/1.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.79/1.33 % 4.79/1.34 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 4.79/1.35 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 4.79/1.42 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 4.79/1.42 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 6.12/1.53 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.12/1.53 Prover 3: stopped % 6.12/1.54 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.12/1.54 Prover 6: stopped % 6.12/1.54 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 6.12/1.54 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 6.12/1.57 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.86/1.58 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.86/1.59 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 7.10/1.61 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 7.23/1.64 Prover 7: Found proof (size 4) % 7.23/1.64 Prover 7: proved (308ms) % 7.23/1.64 Prover 1: stopped % 7.23/1.67 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.23/1.67 Prover 0: stopped % 7.23/1.67 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.23/1.69 Prover 11: stopped % 7.23/1.69 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.23/1.70 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.23/1.70 Prover 8: stopped % 7.23/1.71 Prover 10: stopped % 7.23/1.72 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.88/1.73 Prover 4: stopped % 7.88/1.74 % 7.88/1.74 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 7.88/1.74 % 7.88/1.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 7.88/1.75 Assumptions after simplification: % 7.88/1.75 --------------------------------- % 7.88/1.75 % 7.88/1.75 (just6) % 7.88/1.75 $i(c_tptpcol_15_30970) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_30972) & genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972, % 7.88/1.75 c_tptpcol_15_30970) % 7.88/1.75 % 7.88/1.75 (query43) % 7.88/1.75 $i(c_tptp_member2862_mt) & $i(c_tptpcol_15_30970) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_30972) & % 7.88/1.75 mtvisible(c_tptp_member2862_mt) & ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972, % 7.88/1.75 c_tptpcol_15_30970) % 7.88/1.75 % 7.88/1.75 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 7.88/1.75 -------------------------------------------- % 7.88/1.75 just1, just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18, % 7.88/1.75 just19, just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27, % 7.88/1.75 just28, just29, just3, just30, just31, just32, just33, just34, just35, just36, % 7.88/1.75 just37, just38, just39, just4, just40, just41, just42, just43, just44, just45, % 7.88/1.75 just46, just47, just48, just49, just5, just50, just51, just52, just53, just54, % 7.88/1.75 just55, just56, just57, just7, just8, just9 % 7.88/1.75 % 7.88/1.75 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 7.88/1.75 --------------------------------- % 7.88/1.75 % 7.88/1.75 Begin of proof % 7.88/1.76 | % 7.88/1.76 | ALPHA: (query43) implies: % 7.88/1.76 | (1) ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972, c_tptpcol_15_30970) % 7.88/1.76 | % 7.88/1.76 | ALPHA: (just6) implies: % 7.88/1.76 | (2) genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972, c_tptpcol_15_30970) % 7.88/1.76 | % 7.88/1.76 | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (2) imply: % 7.88/1.76 | (3) $false % 7.88/1.76 | % 7.88/1.76 | CLOSE: (3) is inconsistent. % 7.88/1.76 | % 7.88/1.76 End of proof % 7.88/1.76 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 7.88/1.76 % 7.88/1.76 1240ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------