%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR043+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 17.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query243,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2862_mt)
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972,c_tptpcol_15_30970) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query243) ).
fof(ax4_15598,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972,c_tptpcol_15_30970),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_15598) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2862_mt)
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972,c_tptpcol_15_30970) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query243]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972,c_tptpcol_15_30970)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2862_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972,c_tptpcol_15_30970),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_15598]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_30972,c_tptpcol_15_30970),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR043+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.57 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.57 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.57 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.57 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:01 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.57 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.57 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/17.33 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/17.33 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/17.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 359945 completed with status 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.18/17.33 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/17.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/17.33 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/17.33 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/17.33 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/17.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 359948 completed with status 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.18/17.33 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/17.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/17.33 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/17.33 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/17.33 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/17.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.18/17.33 % Preprocessing time : 0.243 s
% 0.18/17.33 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/17.33
% 0.18/17.33 % Proof found!
% 0.18/17.33 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/17.33 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/17.33 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.18/17.33 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539885
% 0.18/17.33 % Initial clauses : 366
% 0.18/17.33 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.18/17.33 % Initial clauses in saturation : 364
% 0.18/17.33 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.18/17.33 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.18/17.33 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/17.33 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/17.33 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/17.33 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/17.33 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/17.33 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.18/17.33 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/17.33 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/17.33 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 361
% 0.18/17.33 % ...number of literals in the above : 567
% 0.18/17.33 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Condensation attempts : 3
% 0.18/17.33 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/17.33 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3690241
% 0.18/17.33 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173875
% 0.18/17.33
% 0.18/17.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/17.33 % User time : 2.068 s
% 0.18/17.33 % System time : 0.866 s
% 0.18/17.33 % Total time : 2.934 s
% 0.18/17.33 % Maximum resident set size: 1242116 pages
% 0.18/17.33
% 0.18/17.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/17.33 % User time : 14.940 s
% 0.18/17.33 % System time : 1.629 s
% 0.18/17.33 % Total time : 16.569 s
% 0.18/17.33 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.18/17.33 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------