%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR044+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 19.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 28 ~; 23 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query244,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)
=> ( tptpcol_16_29490(X23)
& tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X23) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query244) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_28214,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_28214) ).
fof(ax4_68393,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ( executionbyfiringsquad(X6)
& mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) )
=> tptp_9_720(X6,f_relationallexistsfn(X6,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_68393) ).
fof(ax4_71548,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_71548) ).
fof(ax4_462257,axiom,
! [X23] :
( isa(X23,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
=> tptpcol_16_29490(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_462257) ).
fof(ax4_8894,axiom,
! [X6,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( relationallexists(X10,X9,X11)
& isa(X6,X9) )
=> isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X6,X10,X9,X11),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_8894) ).
fof(ax4_68394,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_68394) ).
fof(ax4_81496,axiom,
executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_81496) ).
fof(ax4_537066,axiom,
! [X23] :
( executionbyfiringsquad(X23)
=> isa(X23,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_537066) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)
=> ( tptpcol_16_29490(X23)
& tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X23) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query244]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X118,X119] :
( mtvisible(X119)
| ~ genlmt(X118,X119)
| ~ mtvisible(X118) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X30)
| ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X30) )
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_28214]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X35] :
( tptp_9_720(X35,f_relationallexistsfn(X35,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X35)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_68393])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_71548]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X31] :
( tptpcol_16_29490(X31)
| ~ isa(X31,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_462257])])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X51,X52,X53,X54] :
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X51,X53,X52,X54),X54)
| ~ relationallexists(X53,X52,X54)
| ~ isa(X51,X52) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_8894])])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_68394])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
| tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_81496]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| tptpcol_16_29490(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ relationallexists(X3,X2,X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X3,X2,X4),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_20])]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X86] :
( isa(X86,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X86) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_537066])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
| isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR044+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:32:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/19.26 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/19.26 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/19.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2155784 completed with status 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.19/19.26 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/19.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/19.26 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/19.26 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/19.26 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/19.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 574 seconds (574 total)
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2156053 completed with status 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.19/19.26 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/19.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/19.26 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/19.26 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/19.26 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/19.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 574 seconds (574 total)
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.19/19.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.446 s
% 0.19/19.26 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/19.26
% 0.19/19.26 % Proof found!
% 0.19/19.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/19.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/19.26 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.19/19.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539027
% 0.19/19.26 % Initial clauses : 1224
% 0.19/19.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.19/19.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1222
% 0.19/19.26 % Processed clauses : 3959
% 0.19/19.26 % ...of these trivial : 176
% 0.19/19.26 % ...subsumed : 187
% 0.19/19.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 3596
% 0.19/19.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.19/19.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.19/19.26 % Backward-rewritten : 57
% 0.19/19.26 % Generated clauses : 10952
% 0.19/19.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9845
% 0.19/19.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Paramodulations : 10951
% 0.19/19.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/19.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Total rewrite steps : 1428
% 0.19/19.26 % ...of those cached : 1034
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/19.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/19.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/19.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/19.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/19.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 2462
% 0.19/19.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 870
% 0.19/19.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Negative unit clauses : 73
% 0.19/19.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 1519
% 0.19/19.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8108
% 0.19/19.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 23557
% 0.19/19.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 1133
% 0.19/19.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 312471
% 0.19/19.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 197135
% 0.19/19.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 186
% 0.19/19.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33122
% 0.19/19.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 514
% 0.19/19.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 50
% 0.19/19.26 % Condensation attempts : 4032
% 0.19/19.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/19.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3834779
% 0.19/19.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2172834
% 0.19/19.26
% 0.19/19.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/19.26 % User time : 3.344 s
% 0.19/19.26 % System time : 1.229 s
% 0.19/19.26 % Total time : 4.573 s
% 0.19/19.26 % Maximum resident set size: 1242276 pages
% 0.19/19.26
% 0.19/19.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/19.26 % User time : 17.070 s
% 0.19/19.26 % System time : 2.696 s
% 0.19/19.26 % Total time : 19.766 s
% 0.19/19.26 % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 0.19/19.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------