%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.35s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 28 ~; 18 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(just15,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just15) ).
fof(just10,axiom,
! [X1] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
=> individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just10) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( intangibleindividual(X1)
=> partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just6) ).
fof(just8,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> intangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just8) ).
fof(just3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just3) ).
fof(just14,axiom,
! [X1] :
( applicationcontext(X1)
=> microtheory(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just14) ).
fof(query45,conjecture,
~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query45) ).
fof(just1,axiom,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).
fof(just20,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( genls(X7,X8)
=> collection(X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just20) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X53] :
( ~ individual(X53)
| ~ collection(X53) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just15])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X79] :
( individual(X79)
| ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X79) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X95] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X95)
| ~ intangibleindividual(X95) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X98] :
( intangibleindividual(X98)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X98) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ intangibleindividual(X1)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| intangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X82] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X82)
| ~ microtheory(X82) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X76] :
( microtheory(X76)
| ~ applicationcontext(X76) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just14])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query45]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ applicationcontext(X1)
| microtheory(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just1]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( collection(X17)
| ~ genls(X17,X18) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just20])])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
~ collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:33:54 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.35/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % sh5l with pid 1225107 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.35/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.35/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.35/0.54 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1225114 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.35/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.35/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.35/0.54 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.35/0.54
% 0.35/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.35/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.35/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.35/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25
% 0.35/0.54 % Initial clauses : 60
% 0.35/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 60
% 0.35/0.54 % Processed clauses : 93
% 0.35/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.35/0.54 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.35/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 83
% 0.35/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Generated clauses : 102
% 0.35/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 61
% 0.35/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Paramodulations : 102
% 0.35/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 38
% 0.35/0.54 % ...of those cached : 27
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 83
% 0.35/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.35/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.35/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 0.35/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.35/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 66
% 0.35/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 139
% 0.35/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 130
% 0.35/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.35/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.35/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.35/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4246
% 0.35/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 692
% 0.35/0.54
% 0.35/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.54 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.35/0.54 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.35/0.54 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.35/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.35/0.54
% 0.35/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.54 % User time : 0.018 s
% 0.35/0.54 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.35/0.54 % Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.35/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.35/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------