%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR045+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.66s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 26 ~; 18 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax1_320,axiom,
! [X1] :
( intangibleindividual(X1)
=> partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_320) ).
fof(ax1_382,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> intangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_382) ).
fof(ax1_33,axiom,
! [X1] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
=> individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_33) ).
fof(ax1_156,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_156) ).
fof(ax1_289,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_289) ).
fof(ax1_171,axiom,
! [X1] :
( applicationcontext(X1)
=> microtheory(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_171) ).
fof(query95,conjecture,
~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query95) ).
fof(ax1_83,axiom,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_83) ).
fof(ax1_229,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( genls(X5,X6)
=> collection(X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_229) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X160] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X160)
| ~ intangibleindividual(X160) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_320])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X185] :
( intangibleindividual(X185)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X185) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_382])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X38] :
( individual(X38)
| ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X38) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_33])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ intangibleindividual(X1)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| intangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X91] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X91)
| ~ microtheory(X91) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_156])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X145] :
( ~ individual(X145)
| ~ collection(X145) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_289])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X97] :
( microtheory(X97)
| ~ applicationcontext(X97) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_171])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query95]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ applicationcontext(X1)
| microtheory(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_83]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X120,X121] :
( collection(X120)
| ~ genls(X120,X121) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_229])])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
~ collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR045+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:02 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.66/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.66/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.66/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % new_bool_3 with pid 3179021 completed with status 9
% 0.66/0.62 % new_bool_1 with pid 3179022 completed with status 9
% 0.66/0.62 % sh5l with pid 3179023 completed with status 9
% 0.66/0.62 % G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3179020 completed with status 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.66/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.66/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.66/0.62 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.66/0.62 % Search class: FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.66/0.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 82s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3179041 completed with status 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.66/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.66/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.66/0.62 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.66/0.62 % Search class: FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.66/0.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.66/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.66/0.62
% 0.66/0.62 % Proof found!
% 0.66/0.62 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.66/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.66/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.66/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Initial clauses : 1132
% 0.66/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1132
% 0.66/0.62 % Processed clauses : 1375
% 0.66/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 60
% 0.66/0.62 % ...subsumed : 16
% 0.66/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 1299
% 0.66/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.66/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Generated clauses : 1616
% 0.66/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1353
% 0.66/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Paramodulations : 1616
% 0.66/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 83
% 0.66/0.62 % ...of those cached : 34
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 1298
% 0.66/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 398
% 0.66/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 234
% 0.66/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 666
% 0.66/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1019
% 0.66/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 1480
% 0.66/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.66/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70548
% 0.66/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67855
% 0.66/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.66/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 109646
% 0.66/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.66/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 63389
% 0.66/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7367
% 0.66/0.62
% 0.66/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.66/0.62 % User time : 0.126 s
% 0.66/0.62 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.66/0.62 % Total time : 0.144 s
% 0.66/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 6912 pages
% 0.66/0.62
% 0.66/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.66/0.62 % User time : 0.543 s
% 0.66/0.62 % System time : 0.208 s
% 0.66/0.62 % Total time : 0.751 s
% 0.66/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.66/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------