↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR045+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.92s 2.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_363,plain,
    ( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
    | ~ intangibleindividual(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_363) ).

cnf(i_0_427,plain,
    ( intangibleindividual(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_427) ).

cnf(i_0_380,plain,
    ( individual(X1)
    | ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_380) ).

cnf(i_0_186,plain,
    ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_186) ).

cnf(i_0_202,plain,
    ( microtheory(X1)
    | ~ applicationcontext(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_202) ).

cnf(i_0_896,plain,
    applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_896) ).

cnf(i_0_327,plain,
    ( ~ individual(X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_327) ).

cnf(i_0_263,plain,
    ( collection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_263) ).

cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
    genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sv2w1h2h/lgb.p',i_0_1065) ).

cnf(c_0_1075,plain,
    ( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
    | ~ intangibleindividual(X1) ),
    i_0_363 ).

cnf(c_0_1076,plain,
    ( intangibleindividual(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    i_0_427 ).

cnf(c_0_1077,plain,
    ( individual(X1)
    | ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
    i_0_380 ).

cnf(c_0_1078,plain,
    ( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1075,c_0_1076]) ).

cnf(c_0_1079,plain,
    ( individual(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1077,c_0_1078]) ).

cnf(c_0_1080,plain,
    ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    i_0_186 ).

cnf(c_0_1081,plain,
    ( microtheory(X1)
    | ~ applicationcontext(X1) ),
    i_0_202 ).

cnf(c_0_1082,plain,
    applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    i_0_896 ).

cnf(c_0_1083,plain,
    ( individual(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1079,c_0_1080]) ).

cnf(c_0_1084,plain,
    microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1081,c_0_1082]) ).

cnf(c_0_1085,plain,
    ( ~ individual(X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    i_0_327 ).

cnf(c_0_1086,plain,
    individual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1083,c_0_1084]) ).

cnf(c_0_1087,plain,
    ( collection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_263 ).

cnf(c_0_1088,negated_conjecture,
    genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
    i_0_1065 ).

cnf(c_0_1089,plain,
    ~ collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1085,c_0_1086]) ).

cnf(c_0_1090,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1087,c_0_1088]),c_0_1089]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : CSR045+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.18/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 12:59:14 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.92/2.77  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.92/2.77  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.92/2.77  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.92/2.77  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.92/2.77  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.92/2.77  #
% 7.92/2.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 7.92/2.77  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.92/2.77  
% 7.92/2.77  # Proof found!
% 7.92/2.77  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.92/2.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.92/2.77  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.92/2.77  
% 7.92/2.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.92/2.77  # User time                : 0.072 s
% 7.92/2.77  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.92/2.77  # Total time               : 0.077 s
% 7.92/2.77  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.92/2.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------