%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR045+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.13s 1.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 23 ~; 17 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax2_3129,axiom,
! [X1] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
=> individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3129) ).
fof(ax2_1340,axiom,
! [X1] :
( intangibleindividual(X1)
=> partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1340) ).
fof(ax2_1482,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> intangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1482) ).
fof(query145,conjecture,
~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query145) ).
fof(ax2_3192,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3192) ).
fof(ax2_1265,axiom,
! [X1] :
( applicationcontext(X1)
=> microtheory(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1265) ).
fof(ax2_529,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( genls(X3,X4)
=> collection(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_529) ).
fof(ax2_1253,axiom,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1253) ).
fof(ax2_3089,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3089) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X934] :
( individual(X934)
| ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X934) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3129])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X411] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X411)
| ~ intangibleindividual(X411) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1340])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ intangibleindividual(X1)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X456] :
( intangibleindividual(X456)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X456) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1482])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query145]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ intangibleindividual(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| intangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X947] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X947)
| ~ microtheory(X947) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3192])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X391] :
( microtheory(X391)
| ~ applicationcontext(X391) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1265])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X173,X174] :
( collection(X173)
| ~ genls(X173,X174) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_529])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ applicationcontext(X1)
| microtheory(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1253]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X922] :
( ~ individual(X922)
| ~ collection(X922) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3089])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
individual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR045+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:31:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.13/1.84 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.13/1.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.13/1.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % new_bool_1 with pid 1333473 completed with status 9
% 5.13/1.84 % new_bool_3 with pid 1333472 completed with status 9
% 5.13/1.84 % sh5l with pid 1333474 completed with status 9
% 5.13/1.84 % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 1333471 completed with status 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 5.13/1.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.13/1.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.13/1.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.13/1.84 % Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 5.13/1.84 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 901s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 146s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1333514 completed with status 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 5.13/1.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.13/1.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.13/1.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.13/1.84 % Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 5.13/1.84 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.13/1.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 5.13/1.84 % Preprocessing time : 0.082 s
% 5.13/1.84
% 5.13/1.84 % Proof found!
% 5.13/1.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.13/1.84 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.13/1.84 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 5.13/1.84 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Initial clauses : 8006
% 5.13/1.84 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8006
% 5.13/1.84 % Processed clauses : 10848
% 5.13/1.84 % ...of these trivial : 2472
% 5.13/1.84 % ...subsumed : 255
% 5.13/1.84 % ...remaining for further processing : 8121
% 5.13/1.84 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 5.13/1.84 % Backward-rewritten : 16
% 5.13/1.84 % Generated clauses : 12901
% 5.13/1.84 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11456
% 5.13/1.84 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Paramodulations : 12901
% 5.13/1.84 % Factorizations : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % NegExts : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Total rewrite steps : 2860
% 5.13/1.84 % ...of those cached : 2078
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional check models : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.13/1.84 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.13/1.84 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.13/1.84 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.13/1.84 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.13/1.84 % Current number of processed clauses : 8104
% 5.13/1.84 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4259
% 5.13/1.84 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Negative unit clauses : 214
% 5.13/1.84 % Non-unit-clauses : 3631
% 5.13/1.84 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8614
% 5.13/1.84 % ...number of literals in the above : 10987
% 5.13/1.84 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 5.13/1.84 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1842927
% 5.13/1.84 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1750483
% 5.13/1.84 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 255
% 5.13/1.84 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 327259
% 5.13/1.84 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % BW rewrite match attempts : 42
% 5.13/1.84 % BW rewrite match successes : 16
% 5.13/1.84 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.13/1.84 % Termbank termtop insertions : 427708
% 5.13/1.84 % Search garbage collected termcells : 41040
% 5.13/1.84
% 5.13/1.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.13/1.84 % User time : 1.168 s
% 5.13/1.84 % System time : 0.094 s
% 5.13/1.84 % Total time : 1.262 s
% 5.13/1.84 % Maximum resident set size: 24180 pages
% 5.13/1.84
% 5.13/1.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.13/1.84 % User time : 5.322 s
% 5.13/1.84 % System time : 0.669 s
% 5.13/1.84 % Total time : 5.991 s
% 5.13/1.84 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 5.13/1.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------