↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR045+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 28.60s 5.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 28.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;  51 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   87 (   0 equ;  42 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2236,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_applicationcontext)
    | ~ applicationcontext(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2236) ).

cnf(i_0_81,plain,
    applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_81) ).

cnf(i_0_399,plain,
    ( ~ isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ isa(X1,X3)
    | ~ disjointwith(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_399) ).

cnf(i_0_2321,plain,
    ( disjointwith(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X3)
    | ~ disjointwith(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2321) ).

cnf(i_0_420,plain,
    disjointwith(c_individual,c_setorcollection),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_420) ).

cnf(i_0_2539,plain,
    ( genls(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X3)
    | ~ genls(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2539) ).

cnf(i_0_767,plain,
    genls(c_partiallyintangibleindividual,c_individual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_767) ).

cnf(i_0_112,plain,
    genls(c_intangibleindividual,c_partiallyintangibleindividual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_112) ).

cnf(i_0_174,plain,
    genls(c_aspatialinformationstore,c_intangibleindividual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_174) ).

cnf(i_0_70,plain,
    ( collection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_70) ).

cnf(i_0_2641,negated_conjecture,
    genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2641) ).

cnf(i_0_2225,plain,
    ( setorcollection(X1)
    | ~ subsetof(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2225) ).

cnf(i_0_20,plain,
    ( subsetof(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_20) ).

cnf(i_0_2537,plain,
    ( genls(X1,X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2537) ).

cnf(i_0_786,plain,
    genls(c_microtheory,c_aspatialinformationstore),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_786) ).

cnf(i_0_88,plain,
    genls(c_applicationcontext,c_microtheory),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_88) ).

cnf(i_0_2392,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_setorcollection)
    | ~ setorcollection(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1uzt5xpo/input.p',i_0_2392) ).

cnf(c_0_2659,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_applicationcontext)
    | ~ applicationcontext(X1) ),
    i_0_2236 ).

cnf(c_0_2660,plain,
    applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    i_0_81 ).

cnf(c_0_2661,plain,
    ( ~ isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ isa(X1,X3)
    | ~ disjointwith(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_399 ).

cnf(c_0_2662,plain,
    isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_applicationcontext),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2659,c_0_2660]) ).

cnf(c_0_2663,plain,
    ( disjointwith(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X3)
    | ~ disjointwith(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_2321 ).

cnf(c_0_2664,plain,
    disjointwith(c_individual,c_setorcollection),
    i_0_420 ).

cnf(c_0_2665,plain,
    ( genls(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X3)
    | ~ genls(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_2539 ).

cnf(c_0_2666,plain,
    genls(c_partiallyintangibleindividual,c_individual),
    i_0_767 ).

cnf(c_0_2667,plain,
    genls(c_intangibleindividual,c_partiallyintangibleindividual),
    i_0_112 ).

cnf(c_0_2668,plain,
    genls(c_aspatialinformationstore,c_intangibleindividual),
    i_0_174 ).

cnf(c_0_2669,plain,
    ( collection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_70 ).

cnf(c_0_2670,negated_conjecture,
    genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
    i_0_2641 ).

cnf(c_0_2671,plain,
    ( ~ isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,X1)
    | ~ disjointwith(c_applicationcontext,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2661,c_0_2662]) ).

cnf(c_0_2672,plain,
    ( disjointwith(X1,c_setorcollection)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_individual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2663,c_0_2664]) ).

cnf(c_0_2673,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_individual)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_partiallyintangibleindividual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2665,c_0_2666]) ).

cnf(c_0_2674,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_partiallyintangibleindividual)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_intangibleindividual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2665,c_0_2667]) ).

cnf(c_0_2675,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_intangibleindividual)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_aspatialinformationstore) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2665,c_0_2668]) ).

cnf(c_0_2676,plain,
    ( setorcollection(X1)
    | ~ subsetof(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2225 ).

cnf(c_0_2677,plain,
    ( subsetof(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_2678,plain,
    ( genls(X1,X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    i_0_2537 ).

cnf(c_0_2679,negated_conjecture,
    collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2669,c_0_2670]) ).

cnf(c_0_2680,plain,
    ( ~ isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_setorcollection)
    | ~ genls(c_applicationcontext,c_individual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2671,c_0_2672]) ).

cnf(c_0_2681,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_individual)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_intangibleindividual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2673,c_0_2674]) ).

cnf(c_0_2682,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_intangibleindividual)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_aspatialinformationstore)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2665,c_0_2675]) ).

cnf(c_0_2683,plain,
    genls(c_microtheory,c_aspatialinformationstore),
    i_0_786 ).

cnf(c_0_2684,plain,
    ( setorcollection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2676,c_0_2677]) ).

cnf(c_0_2685,plain,
    genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2678,c_0_2679]) ).

cnf(c_0_2686,plain,
    ( ~ isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_setorcollection)
    | ~ genls(c_applicationcontext,c_intangibleindividual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2680,c_0_2681]) ).

cnf(c_0_2687,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_intangibleindividual)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_microtheory) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2682,c_0_2683]) ).

cnf(c_0_2688,plain,
    genls(c_applicationcontext,c_microtheory),
    i_0_88 ).

cnf(c_0_2689,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_setorcollection)
    | ~ setorcollection(X1) ),
    i_0_2392 ).

cnf(c_0_2690,plain,
    setorcollection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2684,c_0_2685]) ).

cnf(c_0_2691,plain,
    ~ isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_setorcollection),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2686,c_0_2687]),c_0_2688])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2692,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2689,c_0_2690]),c_0_2691]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR045+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 05:24:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.52  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.52  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.52  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.52  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 28.60/5.63  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 28.60/5.63  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 28.60/5.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.049 s
% 28.60/5.63  
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof found!
% 28.60/5.63  # SZS status Theorem
% 28.60/5.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object total steps             : 51
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object clause steps            : 34
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 17
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 17
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object generating inferences   : 17
% 28.60/5.63  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 28.60/5.63  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 28.60/5.63  # Parsed axioms                        : 2641
% 28.60/5.63  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Initial clauses                      : 2641
% 28.60/5.63  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2641
% 28.60/5.63  # Processed clauses                    : 10526
% 28.60/5.63  # ...of these trivial                  : 1278
% 28.60/5.63  # ...subsumed                          : 412
% 28.60/5.63  # ...remaining for further processing  : 8836
% 28.60/5.63  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 28.60/5.63  # Backward-rewritten                   : 19
% 28.60/5.63  # Generated clauses                    : 21648
% 28.60/5.63  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 20383
% 28.60/5.63  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 15
% 28.60/5.63  # Paramodulations                      : 21648
% 28.60/5.63  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 28.60/5.63  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8812
% 28.60/5.63  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1614
% 28.60/5.63  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 28.60/5.63  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2703
% 28.60/5.63  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4495
% 28.60/5.63  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12459
% 28.60/5.63  # ...number of literals in the above   : 22892
% 28.60/5.63  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 28.60/5.63  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3079150
% 28.60/5.63  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2394459
% 28.60/5.63  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 242
% 28.60/5.63  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4443644
% 28.60/5.63  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 19
% 28.60/5.63  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 28.60/5.63  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 28.60/5.63  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 215847
% 28.60/5.63  
% 28.60/5.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 28.60/5.63  # User time                : 2.449 s
% 28.60/5.63  # System time              : 0.038 s
% 28.60/5.63  # Total time               : 2.487 s
% 28.60/5.63  # ...preprocessing         : 0.049 s
% 28.60/5.63  # ...main loop             : 2.438 s
% 28.60/5.63  # Maximum resident set size: 43436 pages
% 28.60/5.63  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------