%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR045+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 14.39s 4.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 14.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 24 ~; 17 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax3_10185,axiom,
! [X1] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
=> individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10185) ).
fof(ax3_16874,axiom,
! [X1] :
( intangibleindividual(X1)
=> partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_16874) ).
fof(query195,conjecture,
~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query195) ).
fof(ax3_6118,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> intangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6118) ).
fof(ax3_19537,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( genls(X2,X3)
=> collection(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_19537) ).
fof(ax3_5173,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5173) ).
fof(ax3_567,axiom,
! [X1] :
( applicationcontext(X1)
=> microtheory(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_567) ).
fof(ax3_4028,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4028) ).
fof(ax3_6724,axiom,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6724) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2272] :
( individual(X2272)
| ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X2272) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_10185])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3738] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X3738)
| ~ intangibleindividual(X3738) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_16874])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query195]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ intangibleindividual(X1)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1365] :
( intangibleindividual(X1365)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1365) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6118])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X4347,X4348] :
( collection(X4347)
| ~ genls(X4347,X4348) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_19537])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ intangibleindividual(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| intangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1129] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1129)
| ~ microtheory(X1129) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5173])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X131] :
( microtheory(X131)
| ~ applicationcontext(X131) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_567])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X880] :
( ~ individual(X880)
| ~ collection(X880) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4028])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ applicationcontext(X1)
| microtheory(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_6724]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| individual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ individual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR045+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:33:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.39/4.94 % Version: 3.5.1
% 14.39/4.94 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 14.39/4.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 2011429 completed with status 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 14.39/4.94 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 14.39/4.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 14.39/4.94 % No SInE strategy applied
% 14.39/4.94 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 14.39/4.94 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1498 seconds (1498 total)
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 150s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 899s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 150s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting new_bool_3 with 149s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with pid 2011463 completed with status 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Result found by G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 14.39/4.94 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 14.39/4.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 14.39/4.94 % No SInE strategy applied
% 14.39/4.94 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 14.39/4.94 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1498 seconds (1498 total)
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 150s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 899s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 150s (1) cores
% 14.39/4.94 % Preprocessing time : 0.335 s
% 14.39/4.94
% 14.39/4.94 % Proof found!
% 14.39/4.94 % SZS status Theorem
% 14.39/4.94 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.39/4.94 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 14.39/4.94 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Initial clauses : 44217
% 14.39/4.94 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 14.39/4.94 % Initial clauses in saturation : 44214
% 14.39/4.94 % Processed clauses : 5902
% 14.39/4.94 % ...of these trivial : 577
% 14.39/4.94 % ...subsumed : 178
% 14.39/4.94 % ...remaining for further processing : 5147
% 14.39/4.94 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 14.39/4.94 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Generated clauses : 925
% 14.39/4.94 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 859
% 14.39/4.94 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Paramodulations : 924
% 14.39/4.94 % Factorizations : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % NegExts : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 14.39/4.94 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Total rewrite steps : 593
% 14.39/4.94 % ...of those cached : 553
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional check models : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 14.39/4.94 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 14.39/4.94 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 14.39/4.94 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 14.39/4.94 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 14.39/4.94 % Current number of processed clauses : 5146
% 14.39/4.94 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1338
% 14.39/4.94 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Negative unit clauses : 213
% 14.39/4.94 % Non-unit-clauses : 3595
% 14.39/4.94 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39120
% 14.39/4.94 % ...number of literals in the above : 56117
% 14.39/4.94 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3024733
% 14.39/4.94 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3023785
% 14.39/4.94 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 176
% 14.39/4.94 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 415779
% 14.39/4.94 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Condensation successes : 0
% 14.39/4.94 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1780622
% 14.39/4.94 % Search garbage collected termcells : 183130
% 14.39/4.94
% 14.39/4.94 % -------------------------------------------------
% 14.39/4.94 % User time : 3.438 s
% 14.39/4.94 % System time : 0.185 s
% 14.39/4.94 % Total time : 3.623 s
% 14.39/4.94 % Maximum resident set size: 105472 pages
% 14.39/4.94
% 14.39/4.94 % -------------------------------------------------
% 14.39/4.94 % User time : 6.202 s
% 14.39/4.94 % System time : 0.809 s
% 14.39/4.94 % Total time : 7.011 s
% 14.39/4.94 % Maximum resident set size: 37888 pages
% 14.39/4.94 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------