%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : CSR046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:46 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 6.02s 1.58s % Output : Proof 9.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 08:32:42 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.62 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.62 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.62 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 3.16/1.13 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.16/1.13 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 3.16/1.18 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.16/1.18 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.16/1.18 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.16/1.18 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.16/1.18 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 5.95/1.53 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.02/1.57 Prover 5: proved (931ms) % 6.02/1.58 % 6.02/1.58 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 6.02/1.58 % 6.02/1.59 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 6.62/1.64 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 6.62/1.64 Prover 2: Proving ... % 6.62/1.65 Prover 2: stopped % 6.62/1.65 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 7.12/1.70 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.12/1.71 Prover 6: stopped % 7.12/1.72 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 7.12/1.73 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 7.12/1.74 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.12/1.75 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.12/1.75 Prover 3: stopped % 7.78/1.77 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 7.89/1.80 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.15/1.82 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 8.15/1.83 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 8.23/1.85 Prover 0: Proving ... % 8.23/1.85 Prover 0: stopped % 8.23/1.86 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 8.23/1.90 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.23/1.90 Prover 7: Found proof (size 6) % 8.23/1.90 Prover 7: proved (310ms) % 8.23/1.90 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 8.23/1.91 Prover 1: stopped % 8.23/1.92 Prover 11: stopped % 8.23/1.92 Prover 4: stopped % 8.23/1.95 Prover 13: stopped % 8.23/1.95 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.23/1.96 Prover 10: stopped % 9.08/2.01 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 9.08/2.03 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.54/2.04 Prover 8: stopped % 9.54/2.04 % 9.54/2.04 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 9.54/2.04 % 9.54/2.04 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 9.54/2.05 Assumptions after simplification: % 9.54/2.05 --------------------------------- % 9.54/2.05 % 9.54/2.05 (just7) % 9.54/2.05 $i(c_tptpcol_15_50957) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_50958) & genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, % 9.54/2.05 c_tptpcol_15_50957) % 9.54/2.05 % 9.54/2.06 (query46) % 9.54/2.08 $i(c_tptpcol_15_50957) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_50958) & $i(c_translation_0_885) & % 9.54/2.08 $i(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: % 9.54/2.08 $i] : ? [v2: $i] : % 9.54/2.08 (f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) = v0 & % 9.54/2.08 f_urlreferentfn(v0) = v1 & f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(v1, % 9.54/2.08 c_translation_0_885) = v2 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & mtvisible(v2) & ~ % 9.54/2.08 genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957)) % 9.54/2.08 % 9.54/2.08 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 9.54/2.08 -------------------------------------------- % 9.54/2.08 just1, just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18, % 9.54/2.08 just19, just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27, % 9.54/2.08 just28, just29, just3, just30, just31, just32, just33, just34, just35, just36, % 9.54/2.08 just37, just38, just39, just4, just40, just41, just42, just43, just44, just45, % 9.54/2.08 just46, just47, just48, just49, just5, just50, just51, just52, just53, just54, % 9.54/2.08 just55, just56, just57, just58, just59, just6, just60, just61, just62, just63, % 9.54/2.08 just64, just65, just66, just8, just9 % 9.54/2.08 % 9.54/2.08 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 9.54/2.08 --------------------------------- % 9.54/2.08 % 9.54/2.08 Begin of proof % 9.54/2.08 | % 9.54/2.09 | ALPHA: (just7) implies: % 9.54/2.09 | (1) genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957) % 9.54/2.09 | % 9.54/2.09 | ALPHA: (query46) implies: % 9.54/2.09 | (2) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : % 9.54/2.09 | (f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) = v0 & % 9.54/2.09 | f_urlreferentfn(v0) = v1 & f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(v1, % 9.54/2.09 | c_translation_0_885) = v2 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & % 9.54/2.09 | mtvisible(v2) & ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957)) % 9.54/2.09 | % 9.54/2.09 | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1, all_63_2 % 9.54/2.09 | gives: % 9.54/2.09 | (3) f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) = all_63_2 & % 9.54/2.09 | f_urlreferentfn(all_63_2) = all_63_1 & % 9.54/2.09 | f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(all_63_1, c_translation_0_885) = all_63_0 & % 9.54/2.09 | $i(all_63_0) & $i(all_63_1) & $i(all_63_2) & mtvisible(all_63_0) & ~ % 9.54/2.09 | genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957) % 9.54/2.09 | % 9.54/2.09 | ALPHA: (3) implies: % 9.54/2.09 | (4) ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957) % 9.54/2.09 | % 9.54/2.09 | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (4) imply: % 9.54/2.09 | (5) $false % 9.54/2.09 | % 9.54/2.09 | CLOSE: (5) is inconsistent. % 9.54/2.09 | % 9.54/2.09 End of proof % 9.54/2.09 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 9.54/2.09 % 9.54/2.09 1475ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------