%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR046+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query96,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query96) ).
fof(ax1_399,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_399) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query96]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957)
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_399]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR046+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:18 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % new_bool_1 with pid 3179475 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.26/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.61 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.61 % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 361s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3179478 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.26/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.61 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.61 % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 361s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.61 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/0.61
% 0.26/0.61 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.26/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1106
% 0.26/0.61 % Initial clauses : 27
% 0.26/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.26/0.61 % Processed clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.26/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.26/0.61 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.41/0.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 48
% 0.41/0.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8509
% 0.41/0.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4913
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.61 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.41/0.61 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.41/0.61 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.41/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.61 % User time : 0.037 s
% 0.41/0.61 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.41/0.61 % Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.41/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.41/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------