%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR046+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.51s 6.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query146,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query146) ).
fof(ax2_541,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_541) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query146]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957)
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_541]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR046+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/6.09 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.21/6.09 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/6.09 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/6.09 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/6.09 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/6.09 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/6.09 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/6.09 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:33:50 UTC 2026
% 0.21/6.09 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/6.09 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/6.16 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/6.17 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.51/6.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.51/6.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.51/6.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % new_bool_3 with pid 1106931 completed with status 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.51/6.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.51/6.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.51/6.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.51/6.47 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.51/6.47 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.51/6.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1106935 completed with status 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.51/6.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.51/6.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.51/6.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.51/6.47 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.51/6.47 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.51/6.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.51/6.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.51/6.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.51/6.47
% 0.51/6.47 % Proof found!
% 0.51/6.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.51/6.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.51/6.47 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.51/6.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7986
% 0.51/6.47 % Initial clauses : 21
% 0.51/6.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.51/6.47 % Processed clauses : 5
% 0.51/6.47 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.51/6.47 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.51/6.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.51/6.47 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.51/6.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.51/6.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.51/6.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.51/6.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.51/6.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.51/6.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.51/6.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.51/6.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 34
% 0.51/6.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.51/6.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 51837
% 0.51/6.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31103
% 0.51/6.47
% 0.51/6.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/6.47 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.51/6.47 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.51/6.47 % Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.51/6.47 % Maximum resident set size: 20080 pages
% 0.51/6.47
% 0.51/6.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/6.47 % User time : 0.246 s
% 0.51/6.47 % System time : 0.043 s
% 0.51/6.47 % Total time : 0.289 s
% 0.51/6.47 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 0.51/6.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------