%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR046+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 197.41s 120.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 197.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query296,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query296) ).
fof(ax5_1289879,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1289879) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query296]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957)
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin)),c_translation_0_885)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1289879]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,c_tptpcol_15_50957),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR046+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.39 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:36:25 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 197.41/120.30 % Version: 3.5.1
% 197.41/120.30 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 197.41/120.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 214 seconds (1712 total)
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting sh3 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 3526499 completed with status 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 197.41/120.30 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 197.41/120.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 214 seconds (1712 total)
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting sh3 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 197.41/120.30 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 197.41/120.30 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 197.41/120.30 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 406 seconds (406 total)
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 37s (1) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 41s (1) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 3526926 completed with status 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 197.41/120.30 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 197.41/120.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 214 seconds (1712 total)
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting sh3 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 428s (2) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 197.41/120.30 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 197.41/120.30 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 197.41/120.30 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 406 seconds (406 total)
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 37s (1) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 41s (1) cores
% 197.41/120.30 % Preprocessing time : 2.218 s
% 197.41/120.30 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 197.41/120.30
% 197.41/120.30 % Proof found!
% 197.41/120.30 % SZS status Theorem
% 197.41/120.30 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 197.41/120.30 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 197.41/120.30 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 197.41/120.30 % Initial clauses : 20002
% 197.41/120.30 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 197.41/120.30 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20000
% 197.41/120.30 % Processed clauses : 4
% 197.41/120.30 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % ...subsumed : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 197.41/120.30 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Generated clauses : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Paramodulations : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Factorizations : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % NegExts : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % ...of those cached : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional check models : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 197.41/120.30 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 197.41/120.30 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 197.41/120.30 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 197.41/120.30 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 197.41/120.30 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 197.41/120.30 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 197.41/120.30 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 197.41/120.30 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19996
% 197.41/120.30 % ...number of literals in the above : 28003
% 197.41/120.30 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Condensation attempts : 4
% 197.41/120.30 % Condensation successes : 0
% 197.41/120.30 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22664609
% 197.41/120.30 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10462430
% 197.41/120.30
% 197.41/120.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 197.41/120.30 % User time : 19.544 s
% 197.41/120.30 % System time : 5.222 s
% 197.41/120.30 % Total time : 24.766 s
% 197.41/120.30 % Maximum resident set size: 5023684 pages
% 197.41/120.30
% 197.41/120.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 197.41/120.30 % User time : 105.012 s
% 197.41/120.30 % System time : 9.645 s
% 197.41/120.30 % Total time : 114.657 s
% 197.41/120.30 % Maximum resident set size: 2272768 pages
% 197.41/120.30 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------