%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : CSR047+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:18:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 89.84s 90.06s
% Output : Refutation 89.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query97,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query97) ).
fof(c0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query97]) ).
fof(c1,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0]) ).
cnf(c3,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c1]) ).
fof(ax1_900,axiom,
! [X,Y] :
( borderson(X,Y)
=> borderson(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).
fof(c722,plain,
! [X,Y] :
( ~ borderson(X,Y)
| borderson(Y,X) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900]) ).
fof(c723,plain,
! [X342,X343] :
( ~ borderson(X342,X343)
| borderson(X343,X342) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c722]) ).
cnf(c724,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1617,X1618)
| borderson(X1618,X1617) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c723]) ).
cnf(c2,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c1]) ).
fof(ax1_383,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_383) ).
fof(c2158,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_383]) ).
cnf(c2159,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c2158]) ).
cnf(c9297,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2159,c2]) ).
cnf(c16033,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9297,c724]) ).
cnf(c21604,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16033,c3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : CSR047+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 9 02:05:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 89.84/90.06 % Version: 1.5
% 89.84/90.06 % SZS status Theorem
% 89.84/90.06 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 89.84/90.06
% 89.84/90.06 % Initial clauses : 1133
% 89.84/90.06 % Processed clauses : 6688
% 89.84/90.06 % Factors computed : 8
% 89.84/90.06 % Resolvents computed: 18744
% 89.84/90.06 % Tautologies deleted: 727
% 89.84/90.06 % Forward subsumed : 7559
% 89.84/90.06 % Backward subsumed : 1
% 89.84/90.06 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 89.84/90.06 % User time : 89.646 s
% 89.84/90.06 % System time : 0.062 s
% 89.84/90.06 % Total time : 89.708 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------