↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : CSR047+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.94s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  10   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f383,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_383) ).

fof(f900,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( borderson(X0,X1)
     => borderson(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).

fof(f1132,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query97) ).

fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
     => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1132]) ).

fof(f1141,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
    & ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1133]) ).

fof(f1144,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ borderson(X0,X1)
      | borderson(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f900]) ).

fof(f1147,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f383]) ).

fof(f1158,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1141]) ).

fof(f1159,plain,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1141]) ).

fof(f1162,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ borderson(X0,X1)
      | borderson(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1144]) ).

fof(f1165,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1147]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1159]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1158]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( borderson(X1,X0)
      | ~ borderson(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1162]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1165]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_50,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_129,plain,
    borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_130,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_49]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR047+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:34:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43  % Proving...
% 0.94/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.94/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.94/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.94/1.28  % 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 12 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e % 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.94/1.28   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % 
% 0.94/1.28  % clauses                               4
% 0.94/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 0.94/1.28  % EPR                                   4
% 0.94/1.28  % Horn                                  4
% 0.94/1.28  % unary                                 3
% 0.94/1.28  % binary                                1
% 0.94/1.28  % lits                                  5
% 0.94/1.28  % lits eq                               0
% 0.94/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.94/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.94/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.94/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.94/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Schedule EPR Horn non eq is on
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Option_epr_horn Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ 
% 0.94/1.28  % Current options:
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 0.94/1.28  % 
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.28  
% 0.94/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------