↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR047+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.94s 3.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_246,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-13yjxbq8/input.p',i_0_246) ).

cnf(i_0_2664,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-13yjxbq8/input.p',i_0_2664) ).

cnf(i_0_2083,plain,
    ( borderson(X1,X2)
    | ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-13yjxbq8/input.p',i_0_2083) ).

cnf(i_0_2663,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-13yjxbq8/input.p',i_0_2663) ).

cnf(c_0_2669,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
    i_0_246 ).

cnf(c_0_2670,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
    i_0_2664 ).

cnf(c_0_2671,plain,
    ( borderson(X1,X2)
    | ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2083 ).

cnf(c_0_2672,plain,
    borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2669,c_0_2670])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2673,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
    i_0_2663 ).

cnf(c_0_2674,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2671,c_0_2672]),c_0_2673]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : CSR047+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 18:36:41 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.86/1.04  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.86/1.04  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.86/1.04  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.86/1.04  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.94/3.76  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 9.94/3.76  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.94/3.76  # Preprocessing time       : 0.061 s
% 9.94/3.76  
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof found!
% 9.94/3.76  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.94/3.76  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 9.94/3.76  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 9.94/3.76  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.94/3.76  # Parsed axioms                        : 2663
% 9.94/3.76  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Initial clauses                      : 2663
% 9.94/3.76  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2663
% 9.94/3.76  # Processed clauses                    : 93
% 9.94/3.76  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 9.94/3.76  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 9.94/3.76  # ...remaining for further processing  : 80
% 9.94/3.76  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 9.94/3.76  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 9.94/3.76  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Current number of processed clauses  : 80
% 9.94/3.76  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 54
% 9.94/3.76  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.94/3.76  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 9.94/3.76  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
% 9.94/3.76  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2570
% 9.94/3.76  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3930
% 9.94/3.76  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 128
% 9.94/3.76  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 128
% 9.94/3.76  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 9.94/3.76  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 133
% 9.94/3.76  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.94/3.76  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 36196
% 9.94/3.76  
% 9.94/3.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.94/3.76  # User time                : 0.055 s
% 9.94/3.76  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 9.94/3.76  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 9.94/3.76  # ...preprocessing         : 0.061 s
% 9.94/3.76  # ...main loop             : 0.003 s
% 9.94/3.76  # Maximum resident set size: 10516 pages
% 9.94/3.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------