%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR047+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 14.77s 11.98s
% Output : CNFRefutation 14.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_126,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-phv_vp8e/input.p',i_0_126) ).
cnf(i_0_2746,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-phv_vp8e/input.p',i_0_2746) ).
cnf(i_0_2310,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-phv_vp8e/input.p',i_0_2310) ).
cnf(i_0_2745,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-phv_vp8e/input.p',i_0_2745) ).
cnf(c_0_2751,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
i_0_126 ).
cnf(c_0_2752,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
i_0_2746 ).
cnf(c_0_2753,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2310 ).
cnf(c_0_2754,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2751,c_0_2752])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2755,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
i_0_2745 ).
cnf(c_0_2756,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2753,c_0_2754]),c_0_2755]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR047+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 14:06:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 8.91/9.11 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.91/9.11 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 8.91/9.11 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 8.91/9.11 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 14.77/11.98 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 14.77/11.98 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 14.77/11.98 # Preprocessing time : 0.056 s
% 14.77/11.98
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof found!
% 14.77/11.98 # SZS status Theorem
% 14.77/11.98 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 14.77/11.98 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 14.77/11.98 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 14.77/11.98 # Parsed axioms : 2744
% 14.77/11.98 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Initial clauses : 2744
% 14.77/11.98 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2744
% 14.77/11.98 # Processed clauses : 69
% 14.77/11.98 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # ...subsumed : 4
% 14.77/11.98 # ...remaining for further processing : 65
% 14.77/11.98 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Generated clauses : 9
% 14.77/11.98 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7
% 14.77/11.98 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Paramodulations : 9
% 14.77/11.98 # Factorizations : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Current number of processed clauses : 65
% 14.77/11.98 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 14.77/11.98 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 14.77/11.98 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 14.77/11.98 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2681
% 14.77/11.98 # ...number of literals in the above : 3840
% 14.77/11.98 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 86
% 14.77/11.98 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48
% 14.77/11.98 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 14.77/11.98 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 14.77/11.98 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Condensation successes : 0
% 14.77/11.98 # Termbank termtop insertions : 38129
% 14.77/11.98
% 14.77/11.98 # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.77/11.98 # User time : 0.052 s
% 14.77/11.98 # System time : 0.006 s
% 14.77/11.98 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 14.77/11.98 # ...preprocessing : 0.056 s
% 14.77/11.98 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 14.77/11.98 # Maximum resident set size: 10884 pages
% 14.77/11.98
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------