%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR047+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 95.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query297,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query297) ).
fof(ax5_2505827,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2505827) ).
fof(ax5_1553473,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( borderson(X2,X3)
=> borderson(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1553473) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query297]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2505827])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X36,X37] :
( borderson(X37,X36)
| ~ borderson(X36,X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1553473])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : CSR047+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/15.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/15.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/15.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:23 UTC 2026
% 0.04/15.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/15.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/15.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/15.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/95.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/95.42 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/95.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2574359 completed with status 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.28/95.42 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/95.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/95.42 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.28/95.42 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/95.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 469 seconds (469 total)
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 43s (1) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 47s (1) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2574552 completed with status 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.28/95.42 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/95.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/95.42 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.28/95.42 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/95.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 469 seconds (469 total)
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 43s (1) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 47s (1) cores
% 0.28/95.42 % Preprocessing time : 1.271 s
% 0.28/95.42 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.28/95.42
% 0.28/95.42 % Proof found!
% 0.28/95.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/95.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/95.42 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.28/95.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3329088
% 0.28/95.42 % Initial clauses : 12891
% 0.28/95.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.28/95.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12889
% 0.28/95.42 % Processed clauses : 17297
% 0.28/95.42 % ...of these trivial : 2114
% 0.28/95.42 % ...subsumed : 107
% 0.28/95.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 15076
% 0.28/95.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.28/95.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.28/95.42 % Backward-rewritten : 137
% 0.28/95.42 % Generated clauses : 2744
% 0.28/95.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2018
% 0.28/95.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Paramodulations : 2743
% 0.28/95.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.28/95.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Total rewrite steps : 3227
% 0.28/95.42 % ...of those cached : 1197
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/95.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/95.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/95.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/95.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/95.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 3985
% 0.28/95.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2458
% 0.28/95.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Negative unit clauses : 511
% 0.28/95.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 1016
% 0.28/95.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8528
% 0.28/95.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 11480
% 0.28/95.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 11090
% 0.28/95.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 687736
% 0.28/95.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 614119
% 0.28/95.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 107
% 0.28/95.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 226636
% 0.28/95.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 21468
% 0.28/95.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 132
% 0.28/95.42 % Condensation attempts : 17297
% 0.28/95.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/95.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22440447
% 0.28/95.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10477964
% 0.28/95.42
% 0.28/95.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/95.42 % User time : 15.425 s
% 0.28/95.42 % System time : 4.650 s
% 0.28/95.42 % Total time : 20.075 s
% 0.28/95.42 % Maximum resident set size: 5020612 pages
% 0.28/95.42
% 0.28/95.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/95.42 % User time : 74.436 s
% 0.28/95.42 % System time : 8.553 s
% 0.28/95.42 % Total time : 82.989 s
% 0.28/95.42 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.28/95.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------