%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : CSR048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:09:25 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 22:47:51 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.14/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.14/0.37 # % 0.14/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.14/0.37 # Number of axioms: 41 Number of unprocessed: 33 % 0.14/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.37 # 33 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. % 0.14/0.37 # There are 2 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.37 # Found 7 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.14/0.37 # 2 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.37 # 26 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.37 # 7 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.37 % 0.14/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 % 0.14/0.37 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 2 closures done. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.37 % 0.14/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (mtvisible(c_basekb))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (mtvisible(c_universalvocabularymt))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~borderson(X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (predicate(X1)|~genlpreds(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (predicate(X1)|~genlpreds(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (geographicalregion(X1)|~borderson(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (geographicalregion(X1)|~borderson(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (borderson(X1,X2)|~borderson(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (mtvisible(X1)|~mtvisible(X2)|~genlmt(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (binarypredicate(X1)|~genlinverse(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (genlmt(X1,X1)|~microtheory(X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (binarypredicate(X1)|~genlinverse(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (collection(X1)|~isa(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (collection(X1)|~disjointwith(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (genlpreds(X1,X1)|~predicate(X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (collection(X1)|~disjointwith(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (thing(X1)|~isa(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (microtheory(X1)|~genlmt(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (microtheory(X1)|~genlmt(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (disjointwith(X1,X2)|~disjointwith(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (~disjointwith(X1,X2)|~isa(X3,X2)|~isa(X3,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (genlmt(X1,X2)|~genlmt(X3,X2)|~genlmt(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (isa(X1,X2)|~genls(X3,X2)|~isa(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (disjointwith(X1,X2)|~genls(X1,X3)|~disjointwith(X3,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (disjointwith(X1,X2)|~genls(X2,X3)|~disjointwith(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (genlinverse(X1,X2)|~genlpreds(X1,X3)|~genlinverse(X3,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (genlinverse(X1,X2)|~genlpreds(X3,X2)|~genlinverse(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (genlpreds(X1,X2)|~genlinverse(X3,X2)|~genlinverse(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (genlpreds(X1,X2)|~genlpreds(X3,X2)|~genlpreds(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.37 # Found 4 steps % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_116, plain, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_118, plain, (~genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.14/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.37 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.37 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on % 0.14/0.37 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.14/0.37 # Proof search is over... % 0.14/0.37 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------