%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR048+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query98,conjecture,
? [X6] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query98) ).
fof(ax1_207,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_207) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
& mtvisible(X20) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_140,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_140) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X6] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X6) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query98]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_207])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X22)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( mtvisible(X31)
| ~ genlmt(X30,X31)
| ~ mtvisible(X30) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_140]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR048+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:04 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % sh5l with pid 119656 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.17/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.17/0.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.46 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 119657 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.17/0.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.46 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.17/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1046
% 0.17/0.46 % Initial clauses : 87
% 0.17/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 87
% 0.17/0.46 % Processed clauses : 154
% 0.17/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % ...subsumed : 28
% 0.17/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 126
% 0.17/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Generated clauses : 156
% 0.17/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 139
% 0.17/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Paramodulations : 156
% 0.17/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.17/0.46 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 125
% 0.17/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.17/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 106
% 0.17/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 71
% 0.17/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 159
% 0.17/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3116
% 0.17/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2924
% 0.17/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 27
% 0.17/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.17/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12300
% 0.17/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5027
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.46 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.46 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.17/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 6100 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.17/0.46 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.17/0.46 % Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.17/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------