%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : CSR048+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.87s 6.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 16 ~; 12 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?; 3 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f140,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_140) ).
fof(f207,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_207) ).
fof(f1123,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( genlmt(X0,X1)
& mtvisible(X0) )
=> mtvisible(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query98) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X0) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1328,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f207]) ).
fof(f2012,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0)
| mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1123]) ).
fof(f2013,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0)
| mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f2012]) ).
fof(f2022,plain,
! [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f2161,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).
fof(f2228,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1328]) ).
fof(f3053,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0)
| mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2013]) ).
fof(f3062,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2022]) ).
fof(f3063,plain,
! [X0] : ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2022]) ).
tcf(c_187,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2161]) ).
tcf(c_254,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2228]) ).
tcf(c_1079,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0)
| ~ genlmt(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3053]) ).
tcf(c_1088,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] : ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3063]) ).
tcf(c_1089,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3062]) ).
tcf(c_1105,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_187,c_1079]) ).
tcf(c_1164,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_254,c_1089,c_1105,c_254]) ).
tcf(c_1166,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1164,c_1088]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR048+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:32:27 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.42
% 0.15/5.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.42
% 0.15/5.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.44 % Proving...
% 1.87/6.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/6.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.87/6.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.87/6.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Parsing...
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 %
% 1.87/6.29 % clauses 1041
% 1.87/6.29 % conjectures 2
% 1.87/6.29 % EPR 980
% 1.87/6.29 % Horn 1041
% 1.87/6.29 % unary 288
% 1.87/6.29 % binary 709
% 1.87/6.29 % lits 1838
% 1.87/6.29 % lits eq 0
% 1.87/6.29 % fd_pure 0
% 1.87/6.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.87/6.29 % fd_cond 0
% 1.87/6.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.87/6.29 % AC symbols 0
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------
% 1.87/6.29 % Current options:
% 1.87/6.29 % ------
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 %
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 1.87/6.29 %
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 1.87/6.29 %
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 1.87/6.29 %
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.87/6.29
% 1.87/6.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------