↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR048+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 32.66s 32.92s
% Output   : Refutation 32.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR048+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 06:52:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 32.66/32.92  
% 32.66/32.92  SPASS V 3.9 
% 32.66/32.92  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 32.66/32.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 32.66/32.92  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 32.66/32.92  SPASS derived 4 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 7242 clauses.
% 32.66/32.92  SPASS allocated 112721 KBytes.
% 32.66/32.92  SPASS spent	0:0:30.80 on the problem.
% 32.66/32.92  		0:00:00.10 for the input.
% 32.66/32.92  		0:00:07.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 32.66/32.92  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 32.66/32.92  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 32.66/32.92  		0:00:07.76 for the reduction.
% 32.66/32.92  
% 32.66/32.92  
% 32.66/32.92  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 9 :
% 32.66/32.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 32.66/32.92  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 32.66/32.92  1529[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)*l.
% 32.66/32.92  2296[0:Inp] || borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,u)* -> .
% 32.66/32.92  4018[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) -> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x46_y9)*.
% 32.66/32.92  7683[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 32.66/32.92  8008[0:MRR:4018.1,2296.0] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)* -> .
% 32.66/32.92  8010[0:Res:7683.2,8008.0] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)* -> .
% 32.66/32.92  8012[0:Res:1.0,8010.0] || genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)*l -> .
% 32.66/32.92  8013[0:MRR:8012.0,1529.0] ||  -> .
% 32.66/32.92  % SZS output end Refutation
% 32.66/32.92  Formulae used in the proof : query148 ax2_2947 ax2_4430 ax2_7997
% 32.66/32.92  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------