↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : CSR048+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:14:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 31.73s 22.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 31.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   9   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn   5   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query198,conjecture,
    ? [X3] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
     => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query198) ).

fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X22)
        & genlmt(X22,X23) )
     => mtvisible(X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).

fof(ax3_6736,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6736) ).

fof(ax3_4063,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4063) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X3] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
       => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query198]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X48100,X48101] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X48100)
      | ~ genlmt(X48100,X48101)
      | mtvisible(X48101) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X48115] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
      & ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X48115) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6736]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4063]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : CSR048+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.18/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 16:34:31 EDT 2026
% 0.18/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.36  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 31.73/22.03  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 31.73/22.03  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 31.73/22.03  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 31.73/22.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 31.73/22.06  % Total time : 20.481s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------