%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR048+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 23.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query248,conjecture,
? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query248) ).
fof(ax4_14423,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_14423) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_45030,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_45030) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query248]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_14423])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X30)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X63,X64] :
( mtvisible(X64)
| ~ genlmt(X63,X64)
| ~ mtvisible(X63) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_45030]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR048+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.38 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:30:03 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/23.81 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/23.81 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/23.81 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % new_ho_10 with pid 2554294 completed with status 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/23.81 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/23.81 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/23.81 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/23.81 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.81 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.81 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting new_ho_10 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2554299 completed with status 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/23.81 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/23.81 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/23.81 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/23.81 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.81 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/23.81 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.17/23.81 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/23.81 % Preprocessing time : 0.216 s
% 0.17/23.81
% 0.17/23.81 % Proof found!
% 0.17/23.81 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/23.81 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/23.81 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.17/23.81 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539654
% 0.17/23.81 % Initial clauses : 597
% 0.17/23.81 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Initial clauses in saturation : 597
% 0.17/23.81 % Processed clauses : 682
% 0.17/23.81 % ...of these trivial : 82
% 0.17/23.81 % ...subsumed : 29
% 0.17/23.81 % ...remaining for further processing : 571
% 0.17/23.81 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Backward-rewritten : 26
% 0.17/23.81 % Generated clauses : 752
% 0.17/23.81 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 458
% 0.17/23.81 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Paramodulations : 752
% 0.17/23.81 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Total rewrite steps : 312
% 0.17/23.81 % ...of those cached : 209
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.81 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.81 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.81 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.81 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/23.81 % Current number of processed clauses : 545
% 0.17/23.81 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 418
% 0.17/23.81 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Negative unit clauses : 35
% 0.17/23.81 % Non-unit-clauses : 92
% 0.17/23.81 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 371
% 0.17/23.81 % ...number of literals in the above : 490
% 0.17/23.81 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.17/23.81 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1699
% 0.17/23.81 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1297
% 0.17/23.81 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.17/23.81 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1457
% 0.17/23.81 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.17/23.81 % BW rewrite match successes : 26
% 0.17/23.81 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/23.81 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3700315
% 0.17/23.81 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173077
% 0.17/23.81
% 0.17/23.81 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/23.81 % User time : 3.234 s
% 0.17/23.81 % System time : 1.617 s
% 0.17/23.81 % Total time : 4.851 s
% 0.17/23.81 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 0.17/23.81
% 0.17/23.81 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/23.81 % User time : 15.841 s
% 0.17/23.81 % System time : 2.521 s
% 0.17/23.81 % Total time : 18.362 s
% 0.17/23.81 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.17/23.81 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------