%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR048+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 80.84s 75.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 80.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1348,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-suw30jc2/input.p',i_0_1348) ).
cnf(i_0_3738,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-suw30jc2/input.p',i_0_3738) ).
cnf(i_0_2813,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-suw30jc2/input.p',i_0_2813) ).
cnf(i_0_1507,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-suw30jc2/input.p',i_0_1507) ).
cnf(i_0_3739,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-suw30jc2/input.p',i_0_3739) ).
cnf(c_0_3745,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
i_0_1348 ).
cnf(c_0_3746,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
i_0_3738 ).
cnf(c_0_3747,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2813 ).
cnf(c_0_3748,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
i_0_1507 ).
cnf(c_0_3749,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_3739 ).
cnf(c_0_3750,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3745,c_0_3746]) ).
cnf(c_0_3751,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3747,c_0_3748]),c_0_3749])]),c_0_3750]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR048+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 13:13:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 72.15/72.37 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 72.15/72.37 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 72.15/72.37 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 72.15/72.37 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 80.84/75.48 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 80.84/75.48 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 80.84/75.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.074 s
% 80.84/75.48
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof found!
% 80.84/75.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 80.84/75.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 80.84/75.48 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 80.84/75.48 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 80.84/75.48 # Parsed axioms : 3739
% 80.84/75.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Initial clauses : 3739
% 80.84/75.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3739
% 80.84/75.48 # Processed clauses : 150
% 80.84/75.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # ...subsumed : 7
% 80.84/75.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 143
% 80.84/75.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Generated clauses : 8
% 80.84/75.48 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6
% 80.84/75.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Paramodulations : 8
% 80.84/75.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 143
% 80.84/75.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 105
% 80.84/75.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 80.84/75.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 80.84/75.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3594
% 80.84/75.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 5847
% 80.84/75.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 522
% 80.84/75.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 444
% 80.84/75.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 80.84/75.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 80.84/75.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 80.84/75.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 51903
% 80.84/75.48
% 80.84/75.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 80.84/75.48 # User time : 0.068 s
% 80.84/75.48 # System time : 0.009 s
% 80.84/75.48 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 80.84/75.48 # ...preprocessing : 0.074 s
% 80.84/75.48 # ...main loop : 0.003 s
% 80.84/75.48 # Maximum resident set size: 13268 pages
% 80.84/75.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------