↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR050+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 15.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  20   ~;  16   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(just78,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( genlmt(X16,X17)
        & mtvisible(X16) )
     => mtvisible(X17) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just78) ).

fof(just7,axiom,
    genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just7) ).

fof(just6,axiom,
    genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just6) ).

fof(query50,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
   => tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query50) ).

fof(just5,axiom,
    genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just5) ).

fof(just4,axiom,
    genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just4) ).

fof(just1,axiom,
    genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).

fof(just15,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
   => tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just15) ).

fof(just12,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
     => tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just12) ).

fof(just14,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2)
     => tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just14) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X39,X40] :
      ( mtvisible(X40)
      | ~ genlmt(X39,X40)
      | ~ mtvisible(X39) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just78])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just6]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
     => tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query50]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)
    | mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt)
    | mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just5]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
    & mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt)
    | mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)
    | mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just4]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just1]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)
    | mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt)
    | mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] :
      ( tptptypes_7_691(X19,X18)
      | ~ tptptypes_8_692(X18,X19) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just12])])]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] :
      ( tptptypes_8_692(X53,X54)
      | ~ tptptypes_9_693(X53,X54) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just14])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
    | tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : CSR050+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/15.47  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.19/15.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/15.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/15.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/15.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/15.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/15.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/15.47  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:46 UTC 2026
% 0.19/15.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/15.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/15.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/15.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/15.54  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/15.54  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/15.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % sh5l with pid 1001941 completed with status 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/15.54  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/15.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.22/15.54  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/15.54  % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/15.54  % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/15.54  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1001942 completed with status 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.22/15.54  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/15.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.22/15.54  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/15.54  % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/15.54  % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/15.54  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/15.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/15.54  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/15.54  
% 0.22/15.54  % Proof found!
% 0.22/15.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/15.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/15.54  % Parsed axioms                        : 87
% 0.22/15.54  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 29
% 0.22/15.54  % Initial clauses                      : 59
% 0.22/15.54  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 59
% 0.22/15.54  % Processed clauses                    : 132
% 0.22/15.54  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.22/15.54  % ...subsumed                          : 21
% 0.22/15.54  % ...remaining for further processing  : 107
% 0.22/15.54  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.22/15.54  % Generated clauses                    : 163
% 0.22/15.54  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 0.22/15.54  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Paramodulations                      : 163
% 0.22/15.54  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Total rewrite steps                  : 77
% 0.22/15.54  % ...of those cached                   : 50
% 0.22/15.54  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/15.54  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/15.54  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/15.54  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/15.54  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/15.54  % Current number of processed clauses  : 98
% 0.22/15.54  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 58
% 0.22/15.54  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/15.54  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/15.54  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 38
% 0.22/15.54  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.22/15.54  % ...number of literals in the above   : 37
% 0.22/15.54  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.22/15.54  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 379
% 0.22/15.54  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 357
% 0.22/15.54  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
% 0.22/15.54  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.22/15.54  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.22/15.54  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.22/15.54  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/15.54  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4418
% 0.22/15.54  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 539
% 0.22/15.54  
% 0.22/15.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/15.54  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.22/15.54  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/15.54  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.22/15.54  % Maximum resident set size: 3980 pages
% 0.22/15.54  
% 0.22/15.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/15.54  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.22/15.54  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.22/15.54  % Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.22/15.54  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.22/15.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------