%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR050+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:14 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query150,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query150) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( genlmt(X21,X22)
& mtvisible(X21) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_826,axiom,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_826) ).
fof(ax2_1040,axiom,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1040) ).
fof(ax2_1024,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X3,X4)
=> tptptypes_7_691(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1024) ).
fof(ax2_3183,axiom,
genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3183) ).
fof(ax2_1858,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( tptptypes_9_693(X3,X4)
=> tptptypes_8_692(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1858) ).
fof(ax2_1259,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1259) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query150]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( mtvisible(X38)
| ~ genlmt(X37,X38)
| ~ mtvisible(X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_826]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1040]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( tptptypes_7_691(X24,X23)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X23,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1024])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_3183]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)
| mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X39,X40] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X39,X40)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X39,X40) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1858])])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1259])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)
| mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR050+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:35:49 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % new_bool_3 with pid 121320 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.28/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.28/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.28/0.62 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % SubtermCWHack with pid 121324 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.28/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.28/0.62 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.28/0.62
% 0.28/0.62 % Proof found!
% 0.28/0.62 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.28/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7954
% 0.28/0.62 % Initial clauses : 53
% 0.28/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 53
% 0.28/0.62 % Processed clauses : 72
% 0.28/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.28/0.62 % ...subsumed : 16
% 0.28/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 0.28/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.28/0.62 % Generated clauses : 37
% 0.28/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.28/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Paramodulations : 37
% 0.28/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 17
% 0.28/0.62 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 0.28/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 0.28/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.28/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.28/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 31
% 0.28/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 117
% 0.28/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 110
% 0.28/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.28/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.28/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.28/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.28/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 53646
% 0.28/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31124
% 0.28/0.62
% 0.28/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.62 % User time : 0.036 s
% 0.28/0.62 % System time : 0.030 s
% 0.28/0.62 % Total time : 0.066 s
% 0.28/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 20084 pages
% 0.28/0.62
% 0.28/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.62 % User time : 0.155 s
% 0.28/0.62 % System time : 0.046 s
% 0.28/0.62 % Total time : 0.201 s
% 0.28/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 0.28/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------