↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR050+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.79s 2.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  18   ~;  11   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query150,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
   => tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query150) ).

fof(ax2_1024,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( tptptypes_8_692(X3,X4)
     => tptptypes_7_691(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1024) ).

fof(ax2_1858,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( tptptypes_9_693(X3,X4)
     => tptptypes_8_692(X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1858) ).

fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X21)
        & genlmt(X21,X22) )
     => mtvisible(X22) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).

fof(ax2_1259,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
   => tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1259) ).

fof(ax2_1040,axiom,
    genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1040) ).

fof(ax2_338,axiom,
    genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_338) ).

fof(ax2_1319,axiom,
    genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1319) ).

fof(ax2_3183,axiom,
    genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3183) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
     => tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query150]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
    & ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X5,X6)
      | tptptypes_7_691(X6,X5) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1024])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( tptptypes_7_691(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_8_692(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X5,X6)
      | tptptypes_8_692(X5,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1858])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X23)
      | ~ genlmt(X23,X24)
      | mtvisible(X24) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
    | tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1259]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1040]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_338]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1319]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_3183]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ~ mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : CSR050+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:22:49 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.79/2.96  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.79/2.96  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.79/2.96  # Preprocessing time       : 0.094 s
% 0.79/2.96  
% 0.79/2.96  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.79/2.96  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.79/2.96  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.79/2.96  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7958
% 0.79/2.96  # Initial clauses                      : 49
% 0.79/2.96  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 49
% 0.79/2.96  # Processed clauses                    : 71
% 0.79/2.96  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.79/2.96  # ...subsumed                          : 19
% 0.79/2.96  # ...remaining for further processing  : 50
% 0.79/2.96  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Generated clauses                    : 38
% 0.79/2.96  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 22
% 0.79/2.96  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Paramodulations                      : 38
% 0.79/2.96  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of processed clauses  : 50
% 0.79/2.96  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.79/2.96  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.79/2.96  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.79/2.96  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.79/2.96  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 162
% 0.79/2.96  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 143
% 0.79/2.96  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.79/2.96  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.79/2.96  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 53308
% 0.79/2.96  
% 0.79/2.96  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/2.96  # User time                : 0.083 s
% 0.79/2.96  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.79/2.96  # Total time               : 0.095 s
% 0.79/2.96  # Maximum resident set size: 19676 pages
% 0.79/2.96  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.79/2.96  # Preprocessing time       : 0.287 s
% 0.79/2.96  
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof found!
% 0.79/2.96  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.79/2.96  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object total steps             : 33
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object clause steps            : 18
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.79/2.96  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
% 0.79/2.96  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.79/2.96  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.79/2.96  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Initial clauses                      : 8007
% 0.79/2.96  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8007
% 0.79/2.96  # Processed clauses                    : 8649
% 0.79/2.96  # ...of these trivial                  : 650
% 0.79/2.96  # ...subsumed                          : 353
% 0.79/2.96  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7646
% 0.79/2.96  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.79/2.96  # Backward-rewritten                   : 29
% 0.79/2.96  # Generated clauses                    : 23206
% 0.79/2.96  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 21176
% 0.79/2.96  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 20
% 0.79/2.96  # Paramodulations                      : 23206
% 0.79/2.96  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7614
% 0.79/2.96  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2999
% 0.79/2.96  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.79/2.96  #    Negative unit clauses             : 102
% 0.79/2.96  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4513
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20463
% 0.79/2.96  # ...number of literals in the above   : 37284
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Current number of archived clauses   : 32
% 0.79/2.96  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2603134
% 0.79/2.96  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2436434
% 0.79/2.96  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 366
% 0.79/2.96  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 206516
% 0.79/2.96  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2568
% 0.79/2.96  # BW rewrite match successes           : 23
% 0.79/2.96  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.79/2.96  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 490489
% 0.79/2.96  
% 0.79/2.96  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/2.96  # User time                : 0.983 s
% 0.79/2.96  # System time              : 0.035 s
% 0.79/2.96  # Total time               : 1.018 s
% 0.79/2.96  # Maximum resident set size: 67088 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------