%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR050+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.80s 1.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query200,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query200) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_18486,axiom,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_18486) ).
fof(ax3_13706,axiom,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_13706) ).
fof(ax3_3382,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_691(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_3382) ).
fof(ax3_5459,axiom,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5459) ).
fof(ax3_825,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_9_693(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_8_692(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_825) ).
fof(ax3_1228,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1228) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query200]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X38,X39] :
( mtvisible(X39)
| ~ genlmt(X38,X39)
| ~ mtvisible(X38) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_18486]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_13706]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( tptptypes_7_691(X25,X24)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X24,X25) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3382])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_5459]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)
| mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X40,X41] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X40,X41)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X40,X41) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_825])])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1228])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt)
| mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR050+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:38:14 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.80/1.51 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.80/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.80/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % new_bool_1 with pid 2143759 completed with status 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.80/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.80/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.80/1.51 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.80/1.51 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.80/1.51 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.80/1.51 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2143766 completed with status 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.80/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.80/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.80/1.51 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.80/1.51 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.80/1.51 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.80/1.51 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.80/1.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 1.80/1.51
% 1.80/1.51 % Proof found!
% 1.80/1.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.80/1.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.80/1.51 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.80/1.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44123
% 1.80/1.51 % Initial clauses : 95
% 1.80/1.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.80/1.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 94
% 1.80/1.51 % Processed clauses : 143
% 1.80/1.51 % ...of these trivial : 16
% 1.80/1.51 % ...subsumed : 24
% 1.80/1.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 102
% 1.80/1.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.80/1.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 1.80/1.51 % Generated clauses : 131
% 1.80/1.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 92
% 1.80/1.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Paramodulations : 130
% 1.80/1.51 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % NegExts : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.80/1.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Total rewrite steps : 60
% 1.80/1.51 % ...of those cached : 40
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.80/1.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.80/1.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.80/1.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.80/1.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.80/1.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 95
% 1.80/1.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 60
% 1.80/1.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 1.80/1.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 1.80/1.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
% 1.80/1.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 83
% 1.80/1.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 1.80/1.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 754
% 1.80/1.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 696
% 1.80/1.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 24
% 1.80/1.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 1.80/1.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 1.80/1.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 1.80/1.51 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.80/1.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 296612
% 1.80/1.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157722
% 1.80/1.51
% 1.80/1.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.80/1.51 % User time : 0.188 s
% 1.80/1.51 % System time : 0.095 s
% 1.80/1.51 % Total time : 0.283 s
% 1.80/1.51 % Maximum resident set size: 83764 pages
% 1.80/1.51
% 1.80/1.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.80/1.51 % User time : 0.921 s
% 1.80/1.51 % System time : 0.158 s
% 1.80/1.51 % Total time : 1.079 s
% 1.80/1.51 % Maximum resident set size: 37888 pages
% 1.80/1.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------