%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR050+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 25.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 17 ~; 10 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query250,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query250) ).
fof(ax4_17784,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_691(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_17784) ).
fof(ax4_242979,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_9_693(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_8_692(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_242979) ).
fof(ax4_19923,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_19923) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_59290,axiom,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_59290) ).
fof(ax4_4153,axiom,
genlmt(c_analystdatabasemt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_4153) ).
fof(ax4_79089,axiom,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_analystdatabasemt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_79089) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query250]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( tptptypes_7_691(X31,X30)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X30,X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_17784])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X60,X61] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X60,X61)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X60,X61) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_242979])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_19923])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X315,X316] :
( mtvisible(X316)
| ~ genlmt(X315,X316)
| ~ mtvisible(X315) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_59290]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
genlmt(c_analystdatabasemt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_4153]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_analystdatabasemt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_79089]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_analystdatabasemt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR050+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:36:10 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/25.94 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/25.94 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/25.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 1111163 completed with status 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.27/25.94 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/25.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/25.94 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.27/25.94 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.27/25.94 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 564 seconds (564 total)
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 57s (1) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 1111169 completed with status 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.27/25.94 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/25.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/25.94 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.27/25.94 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.27/25.94 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 564 seconds (564 total)
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 57s (1) cores
% 0.27/25.94 % Preprocessing time : 0.461 s
% 0.27/25.94 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.27/25.94
% 0.27/25.94 % Proof found!
% 0.27/25.94 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/25.94 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/25.94 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.27/25.94 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 531847
% 0.27/25.94 % Initial clauses : 8404
% 0.27/25.94 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.27/25.94 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8402
% 0.27/25.94 % Processed clauses : 11970
% 0.27/25.94 % ...of these trivial : 700
% 0.27/25.94 % ...subsumed : 69
% 0.27/25.94 % ...remaining for further processing : 11200
% 0.27/25.94 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.27/25.94 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Backward-subsumed : 25
% 0.27/25.94 % Backward-rewritten : 101
% 0.27/25.94 % Generated clauses : 3569
% 0.27/25.94 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2929
% 0.27/25.94 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Paramodulations : 3568
% 0.27/25.94 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.27/25.94 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Total rewrite steps : 1253
% 0.27/25.94 % ...of those cached : 517
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/25.94 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/25.94 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/25.94 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/25.94 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/25.94 % Current number of processed clauses : 3293
% 0.27/25.94 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1634
% 0.27/25.94 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Negative unit clauses : 420
% 0.27/25.94 % Non-unit-clauses : 1239
% 0.27/25.94 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7140
% 0.27/25.94 % ...number of literals in the above : 8234
% 0.27/25.94 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Current number of archived clauses : 7906
% 0.27/25.94 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 396859
% 0.27/25.94 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 342160
% 0.27/25.94 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 62
% 0.27/25.94 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 341935
% 0.27/25.94 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % BW rewrite match attempts : 66195
% 0.27/25.94 % BW rewrite match successes : 96
% 0.27/25.94 % Condensation attempts : 11972
% 0.27/25.94 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/25.94 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3970476
% 0.27/25.94 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2161543
% 0.27/25.94
% 0.27/25.94 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/25.94 % User time : 5.414 s
% 0.27/25.94 % System time : 2.378 s
% 0.27/25.94 % Total time : 7.792 s
% 0.27/25.94 % Maximum resident set size: 1242404 pages
% 0.27/25.94
% 0.27/25.94 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/25.94 % User time : 23.180 s
% 0.27/25.94 % System time : 4.267 s
% 0.27/25.94 % Total time : 27.447 s
% 0.27/25.94 % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 0.27/25.94 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------