↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR050+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 18.48s 12.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 18.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2087,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_2087) ).

cnf(i_0_1264,plain,
    genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_1264) ).

cnf(i_0_2452,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_2452) ).

cnf(i_0_1505,plain,
    genlmt(c_analystdatabasemt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_1505) ).

cnf(i_0_2304,plain,
    genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_analystdatabasemt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_2304) ).

cnf(i_0_638,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_638) ).

cnf(i_0_2451,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_2451) ).

cnf(i_0_465,plain,
    ( tptptypes_7_691(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_8_692(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_465) ).

cnf(i_0_916,plain,
    ( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezky9su_/input.p',i_0_916) ).

cnf(c_0_2462,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2087 ).

cnf(c_0_2463,plain,
    genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    i_0_1264 ).

cnf(c_0_2464,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
    i_0_2452 ).

cnf(c_0_2465,plain,
    genlmt(c_analystdatabasemt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    i_0_1505 ).

cnf(c_0_2466,plain,
    genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_analystdatabasemt),
    i_0_2304 ).

cnf(c_0_2467,plain,
    mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2462,c_0_2463]),c_0_2464])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2468,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_analystdatabasemt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2462,c_0_2465]) ).

cnf(c_0_2469,plain,
    mtvisible(c_analystdatabasemt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2462,c_0_2466]),c_0_2467])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2470,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
    i_0_638 ).

cnf(c_0_2471,plain,
    mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2468,c_0_2469])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2472,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
    i_0_2451 ).

cnf(c_0_2473,plain,
    ( tptptypes_7_691(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_8_692(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_465 ).

cnf(c_0_2474,plain,
    ( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_916 ).

cnf(c_0_2475,plain,
    tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2470,c_0_2471])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2476,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2472,c_0_2473]) ).

cnf(c_0_2477,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2474,c_0_2475]),c_0_2476]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR050+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 05:12:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 9.15/9.36  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.15/9.36  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 9.15/9.36  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 9.15/9.36  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 18.48/12.28  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 18.48/12.28  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 18.48/12.28  # Preprocessing time       : 0.079 s
% 18.48/12.28  
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof found!
% 18.48/12.28  # SZS status Theorem
% 18.48/12.28  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 18.48/12.28  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 18.48/12.28  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 18.48/12.28  # Parsed axioms                        : 2450
% 18.48/12.28  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Initial clauses                      : 2450
% 18.48/12.28  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2450
% 18.48/12.28  # Processed clauses                    : 3028
% 18.48/12.28  # ...of these trivial                  : 213
% 18.48/12.28  # ...subsumed                          : 73
% 18.48/12.28  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2742
% 18.48/12.28  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 18.48/12.28  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 18.48/12.28  # Backward-rewritten                   : 130
% 18.48/12.28  # Generated clauses                    : 8147
% 18.48/12.28  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 7471
% 18.48/12.28  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Paramodulations                      : 8142
% 18.48/12.28  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 18.48/12.28  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2602
% 18.48/12.28  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1563
% 18.48/12.28  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 18.48/12.28  #    Negative unit clauses             : 255
% 18.48/12.28  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 784
% 18.48/12.28  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6453
% 18.48/12.28  # ...number of literals in the above   : 11611
% 18.48/12.28  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Current number of archived clauses   : 135
% 18.48/12.28  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109605
% 18.48/12.28  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90559
% 18.48/12.28  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 64
% 18.48/12.28  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 135303
% 18.48/12.28  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2296
% 18.48/12.28  # BW rewrite match successes           : 86
% 18.48/12.28  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 18.48/12.28  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 113049
% 18.48/12.28  
% 18.48/12.28  # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.48/12.28  # User time                : 0.257 s
% 18.48/12.28  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 18.48/12.28  # Total time               : 0.274 s
% 18.48/12.28  # ...preprocessing         : 0.079 s
% 18.48/12.28  # ...main loop             : 0.195 s
% 18.48/12.28  # Maximum resident set size: 24588 pages
% 18.48/12.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------