↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR052+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : CSR052+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 01:11:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS derived 79 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 149 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS allocated 97786 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 7, length 18 :
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  9[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_8_39940,c_tptpcol_7_39939)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  10[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_9_40196,c_tptpcol_8_39940)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_10_40324,c_tptpcol_9_40196)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_11_40388,c_tptpcol_10_40324)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  13[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_12_40420,c_tptpcol_11_40388)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  14[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_13_40421,c_tptpcol_12_40420)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  15[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_14_40429,c_tptpcol_13_40421)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  16[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_14_40429)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  19[0:Inp] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  93[0:Inp] || genls(u,v)* genls(v,w)* -> genls(u,w)*.
% 0.18/0.44  208[0:OCh:93.1,93.0,9.0,10.0] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_9_40196,c_tptpcol_7_39939)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  210[0:NCh:93.2,93.1,208.0,19.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_9_40196)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  212[0:NCh:93.2,93.1,210.0,11.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_10_40324)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  213[0:NCh:93.2,93.1,212.0,12.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_11_40388)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  214[0:NCh:93.2,93.1,213.0,13.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_12_40420)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  215[0:NCh:93.2,93.1,214.0,14.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_13_40421)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  216[0:NCh:93.2,93.1,215.0,15.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_14_40429)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  217[0:MRR:216.0,16.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : just8 just10 just12 just14 just16 just18 just20 just22 query52 just85
% 0.18/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------