%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : CSR053+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:00:46 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.49s 1.42s
% Output : Refutation 2.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 1 &; 24 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(mtvisible_decl,type,
mtvisible: $i > $o ).
thf(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt_decl,type,
c_tptpgeo_member1_mt: $i ).
thf(geographicalsubregions_decl,type,
geographicalsubregions: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2_decl,type,
c_georegion_l3_x11_y2: $i ).
thf(c_georegion_l4_x35_y7_decl,type,
c_georegion_l4_x35_y7: $i ).
thf(4,axiom,
( ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible )
=> ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible )
=> ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) )
| ~ ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[15]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
( ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible )
=> ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query53) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible )
=> ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(9,plain,
~ ( ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible )
=> ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ~ ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) )
& ( c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).
thf(11,plain,
c_tptpgeo_member1_mt @ mtvisible,
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(12,plain,
~ ( c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 @ ( c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 @ geographicalsubregions ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(25,plain,
( $false
| ~ $true ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[16,11,12]) ).
thf(26,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR053+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.42 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.42 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 00:21:15 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.42 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.66/0.74 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.89/0.86 % [INFO] Parsing done (115ms).
% 0.89/0.86 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.42/1.06 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.42/1.07 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.42/1.11 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 29 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.70/1.14 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 23 axioms).
% 1.70/1.15 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 1.70/1.15 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.70/1.16 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 2.49/1.42 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 2.49/1.42 % Time passed: 901ms (effective reasoning time: 555ms)
% 2.49/1.42 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.49/1.42 % Axioms used in derivation (1): just1
% 2.49/1.42 % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 2.49/1.42 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 901 ms resp. 555 ms w/o parsing
% 2.49/1.44 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.49/1.44 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------