%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : CSR053+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:53 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 4.12s 1.27s % Output : Proof 6.57s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR053+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 13:30:39 EDT 2023 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.59 ________ _____ % 0.18/0.59 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.18/0.59 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.18/0.59 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.18/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.18/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.18/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.18/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.18/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.18/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.18/0.62 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.41/1.01 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.41/1.01 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.41/1.05 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.41/1.05 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.41/1.05 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.41/1.05 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.41/1.05 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 4.12/1.24 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.12/1.24 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.12/1.26 Prover 5: proved (643ms) % 4.12/1.26 % 4.12/1.27 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.12/1.27 % 4.12/1.27 Prover 2: proved (656ms) % 4.12/1.27 % 4.12/1.27 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.12/1.27 % 4.12/1.28 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 4.12/1.30 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 4.86/1.37 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 4.86/1.37 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 4.86/1.40 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.42/1.42 Prover 6: stopped % 5.42/1.42 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 5.42/1.43 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.42/1.44 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.42/1.45 Prover 3: stopped % 5.42/1.46 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.42/1.46 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 5.42/1.47 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 5.42/1.50 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 6.07/1.52 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.07/1.52 Prover 0: Proving ... % 6.07/1.53 Prover 7: Found proof (size 7) % 6.07/1.53 Prover 7: proved (250ms) % 6.07/1.53 Prover 1: stopped % 6.07/1.53 Prover 0: stopped % 6.07/1.55 Prover 4: stopped % 6.07/1.55 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.07/1.56 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.07/1.56 Prover 10: stopped % 6.07/1.56 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.07/1.57 Prover 11: stopped % 6.07/1.57 Prover 8: stopped % 6.07/1.57 % 6.07/1.57 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 6.07/1.57 % 6.07/1.57 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 6.07/1.58 Assumptions after simplification: % 6.07/1.58 --------------------------------- % 6.07/1.58 % 6.07/1.58 (just1) % 6.57/1.58 $i(c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) & $i(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2) & % 6.57/1.58 $i(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) & ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) | % 6.57/1.58 geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2, c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)) % 6.57/1.58 % 6.57/1.58 (query53) % 6.57/1.59 $i(c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) & $i(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2) & % 6.57/1.59 $i(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) & mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) & ~ % 6.57/1.59 geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2, c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) % 6.57/1.59 % 6.57/1.59 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 6.57/1.59 -------------------------------------------- % 6.57/1.59 just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18, just19, % 6.57/1.59 just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27, just28, % 6.57/1.59 just29, just3, just4, just5, just6, just7, just8, just9 % 6.57/1.59 % 6.57/1.59 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 6.57/1.59 --------------------------------- % 6.57/1.59 % 6.57/1.59 Begin of proof % 6.57/1.59 | % 6.57/1.59 | ALPHA: (query53) implies: % 6.57/1.59 | (1) ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2, c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) % 6.57/1.59 | (2) mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) % 6.57/1.59 | % 6.57/1.59 | ALPHA: (just1) implies: % 6.57/1.59 | (3) ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) | % 6.57/1.59 | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2, c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) % 6.57/1.59 | % 6.57/1.59 | BETA: splitting (3) gives: % 6.57/1.59 | % 6.57/1.59 | Case 1: % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | | (4) ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | | PRED_UNIFY: (2), (4) imply: % 6.57/1.59 | | (5) $false % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | | CLOSE: (5) is inconsistent. % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | Case 2: % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | | (6) geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2, c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (6) imply: % 6.57/1.59 | | (7) $false % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent. % 6.57/1.59 | | % 6.57/1.59 | End of split % 6.57/1.59 | % 6.57/1.59 End of proof % 6.57/1.59 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 6.57/1.59 % 6.57/1.59 997ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------