%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR053+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 19.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query253,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query253) ).
fof(ax4_169406,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_169406) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query253]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_169406])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR053+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.46 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:52 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/19.75 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/19.75 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/19.75 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % sh3 with pid 2525310 completed with status 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Result found by sh3
% 0.29/19.75 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/19.75 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/19.75 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.29/19.75 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/19.75 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/19.75 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 568 seconds (568 total)
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting sh3 with 57s (1) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2525563 completed with status 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.29/19.75 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/19.75 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/19.75 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.29/19.75 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/19.75 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/19.75 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 568 seconds (568 total)
% 0.29/19.75 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.29/19.75 % Preprocessing time : 0.336 s
% 0.29/19.75
% 0.29/19.75 % Proof found!
% 0.29/19.75 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/19.75 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/19.75 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.29/19.75 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539720
% 0.29/19.75 % Initial clauses : 531
% 0.29/19.75 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Initial clauses in saturation : 531
% 0.29/19.75 % Processed clauses : 207
% 0.29/19.75 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.29/19.75 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.29/19.75 % ...remaining for further processing : 193
% 0.29/19.75 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Backward-rewritten : 16
% 0.29/19.75 % Generated clauses : 35
% 0.29/19.75 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 35
% 0.29/19.75 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Paramodulations : 35
% 0.29/19.75 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Total rewrite steps : 27
% 0.29/19.75 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/19.75 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/19.75 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/19.75 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/19.75 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/19.75 % Current number of processed clauses : 177
% 0.29/19.75 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 125
% 0.29/19.75 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Negative unit clauses : 28
% 0.29/19.75 % Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.29/19.75 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 359
% 0.29/19.75 % ...number of literals in the above : 525
% 0.29/19.75 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.29/19.75 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 78
% 0.29/19.75 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71
% 0.29/19.75 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.29/19.75 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 318
% 0.29/19.75 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.29/19.75 % BW rewrite match successes : 16
% 0.29/19.75 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/19.75 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3693835
% 0.29/19.75 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173214
% 0.29/19.75
% 0.29/19.75 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/19.75 % User time : 2.190 s
% 0.29/19.75 % System time : 0.903 s
% 0.29/19.75 % Total time : 3.092 s
% 0.29/19.75 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 0.29/19.75
% 0.29/19.75 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/19.75 % User time : 17.396 s
% 0.29/19.75 % System time : 1.824 s
% 0.29/19.75 % Total time : 19.220 s
% 0.29/19.75 % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 0.29/19.75 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------