%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR054+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.30s 0.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query154,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query154) ).
fof(ax2_3985,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3985) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X15) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query154]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3985])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X23] :
( ~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X23)
& mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR054+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:37:18 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/0.97 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.30/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.30/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % sh5l with pid 3743024 completed with status 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Result found by sh5l
% 1.30/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.30/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.30/0.97 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.30/0.97 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/0.97 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/0.97 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3743058 completed with status 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.30/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.30/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.30/0.97 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.30/0.97 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/0.97 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/0.97 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.30/0.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.30/0.97 % Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 1.30/0.97
% 1.30/0.97 % Proof found!
% 1.30/0.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.30/0.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.30/0.97 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 1.30/0.97 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7085
% 1.30/0.97 % Initial clauses : 922
% 1.30/0.97 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Initial clauses in saturation : 922
% 1.30/0.97 % Processed clauses : 2750
% 1.30/0.97 % ...of these trivial : 446
% 1.30/0.97 % ...subsumed : 304
% 1.30/0.97 % ...remaining for further processing : 1999
% 1.30/0.97 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 1.30/0.97 % Backward-rewritten : 38
% 1.30/0.97 % Generated clauses : 4369
% 1.30/0.97 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2509
% 1.30/0.97 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Paramodulations : 4369
% 1.30/0.97 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % NegExts : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Total rewrite steps : 1721
% 1.30/0.97 % ...of those cached : 1244
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.30/0.97 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.30/0.97 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.30/0.97 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.30/0.97 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.30/0.97 % Current number of processed clauses : 1954
% 1.30/0.97 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1170
% 1.30/0.97 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Negative unit clauses : 139
% 1.30/0.97 % Non-unit-clauses : 645
% 1.30/0.97 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 670
% 1.30/0.97 % ...number of literals in the above : 1225
% 1.30/0.97 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Current number of archived clauses : 45
% 1.30/0.97 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 50080
% 1.30/0.97 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47976
% 1.30/0.97 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 180
% 1.30/0.97 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40311
% 1.30/0.97 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % BW rewrite match attempts : 26
% 1.30/0.97 % BW rewrite match successes : 21
% 1.30/0.97 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.30/0.97 % Termbank termtop insertions : 115228
% 1.30/0.97 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31561
% 1.30/0.97
% 1.30/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.30/0.97 % User time : 0.302 s
% 1.30/0.97 % System time : 0.062 s
% 1.30/0.97 % Total time : 0.364 s
% 1.30/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 20596 pages
% 1.30/0.97
% 1.30/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.30/0.97 % User time : 0.421 s
% 1.30/0.97 % System time : 0.076 s
% 1.30/0.97 % Total time : 0.497 s
% 1.30/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
% 1.30/0.97 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------