%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR054+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.47s 2.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query204,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query204) ).
fof(ax3_1069,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1069) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X16) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query204]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1069])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X24)
& mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR054+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.54 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.54 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.54 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:29 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.59 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.59 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/2.12 % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.47/2.12 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/2.12 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % sh5l with pid 2146604 completed with status 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Result found by sh5l
% 3.47/2.12 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/2.12 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 3.47/2.12 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 3.47/2.12 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.12 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.12 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2146608 completed with status 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 3.47/2.12 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/2.12 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 3.47/2.12 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 3.47/2.12 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.12 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.12 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.47/2.12 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.12 % Preprocessing time : 0.045 s
% 3.47/2.12
% 3.47/2.12 % Proof found!
% 3.47/2.12 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.47/2.12 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.47/2.12 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 3.47/2.12 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 42995
% 3.47/2.12 % Initial clauses : 1223
% 3.47/2.12 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 3.47/2.12 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1222
% 3.47/2.12 % Processed clauses : 3586
% 3.47/2.12 % ...of these trivial : 387
% 3.47/2.12 % ...subsumed : 785
% 3.47/2.12 % ...remaining for further processing : 2413
% 3.47/2.12 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 3.47/2.12 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Backward-subsumed : 16
% 3.47/2.12 % Backward-rewritten : 43
% 3.47/2.12 % Generated clauses : 4645
% 3.47/2.12 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3509
% 3.47/2.12 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Paramodulations : 4644
% 3.47/2.12 % Factorizations : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % NegExts : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 3.47/2.12 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Total rewrite steps : 1270
% 3.47/2.12 % ...of those cached : 934
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional check models : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 3.47/2.12 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 3.47/2.12 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 3.47/2.12 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 3.47/2.12 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 3.47/2.12 % Current number of processed clauses : 2353
% 3.47/2.12 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 983
% 3.47/2.12 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Negative unit clauses : 652
% 3.47/2.12 % Non-unit-clauses : 718
% 3.47/2.12 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1127
% 3.47/2.12 % ...number of literals in the above : 1965
% 3.47/2.12 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Current number of archived clauses : 59
% 3.47/2.12 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 93393
% 3.47/2.12 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 87278
% 3.47/2.12 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 58
% 3.47/2.12 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137599
% 3.47/2.12 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % BW rewrite match attempts : 65
% 3.47/2.12 % BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 3.47/2.12 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Condensation successes : 0
% 3.47/2.12 % Termbank termtop insertions : 370341
% 3.47/2.12 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157969
% 3.47/2.12
% 3.47/2.12 % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.47/2.12 % User time : 0.469 s
% 3.47/2.12 % System time : 0.224 s
% 3.47/2.12 % Total time : 0.693 s
% 3.47/2.12 % Maximum resident set size: 84276 pages
% 3.47/2.12
% 3.47/2.12 % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.47/2.12 % User time : 1.208 s
% 3.47/2.12 % System time : 0.279 s
% 3.47/2.12 % Total time : 1.488 s
% 3.47/2.12 % Maximum resident set size: 37888 pages
% 3.47/2.12 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------