%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR054+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 135.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query304,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query304) ).
fof(ax5_808014,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_808014) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X16) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query304]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_808014])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X34] :
( ~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X34)
& mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR054+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:44 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/135.34 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/135.34 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/135.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 196 seconds (1568 total)
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting new_ho_10 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting sh3 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2147205 completed with status 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.17/135.34 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/135.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 196 seconds (1568 total)
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting new_ho_10 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting sh3 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/135.34 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/135.34 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/135.34 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 368 seconds (368 total)
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 34s (1) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 37s (1) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2147491 completed with status 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.17/135.34 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/135.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 196 seconds (1568 total)
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting new_ho_10 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting sh3 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 392s (2) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/135.34 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/135.34 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/135.34 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 368 seconds (368 total)
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 34s (1) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 37s (1) cores
% 0.17/135.34 % Preprocessing time : 1.532 s
% 0.17/135.34 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/135.34
% 0.17/135.34 % Proof found!
% 0.17/135.34 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/135.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/135.34 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.17/135.34 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 0.17/135.34 % Initial clauses : 20002
% 0.17/135.34 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/135.34 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20000
% 0.17/135.34 % Processed clauses : 1433
% 0.17/135.34 % ...of these trivial : 38
% 0.17/135.34 % ...subsumed : 40
% 0.17/135.34 % ...remaining for further processing : 1354
% 0.17/135.34 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.17/135.34 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.17/135.34 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.17/135.34 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.17/135.34 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.17/135.34 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.17/135.34 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Total rewrite steps : 47
% 0.17/135.34 % ...of those cached : 18
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/135.34 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/135.34 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/135.34 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/135.34 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/135.34 % Current number of processed clauses : 1345
% 0.17/135.34 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 748
% 0.17/135.34 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Negative unit clauses : 28
% 0.17/135.34 % Non-unit-clauses : 569
% 0.17/135.34 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18568
% 0.17/135.34 % ...number of literals in the above : 26519
% 0.17/135.34 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.17/135.34 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 50696
% 0.17/135.34 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47083
% 0.17/135.34 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.17/135.34 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2719
% 0.17/135.34 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % BW rewrite match attempts : 91
% 0.17/135.34 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/135.34 % Condensation attempts : 1433
% 0.17/135.34 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/135.34 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22709127
% 0.17/135.34 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10461863
% 0.17/135.34
% 0.17/135.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/135.34 % User time : 21.099 s
% 0.17/135.34 % System time : 6.257 s
% 0.17/135.34 % Total time : 27.357 s
% 0.17/135.34 % Maximum resident set size: 5023632 pages
% 0.17/135.34
% 0.17/135.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/135.34 % User time : 123.632 s
% 0.17/135.34 % System time : 11.988 s
% 0.17/135.34 % Total time : 135.619 s
% 0.17/135.34 % Maximum resident set size: 2273792 pages
% 0.17/135.34 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------