%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR055+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 125.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 10 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query305,conjecture,
~ disjointwith(c_xskijump_thegame,c_tptpcol_16_35301),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query305) ).
fof(ax5_2620972,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( disjointwith(X2,X3)
=> collection(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2620972) ).
fof(ax5_1365323,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1365323) ).
fof(ax5_1553900,axiom,
individual(c_xskijump_thegame),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1553900) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ disjointwith(c_xskijump_thegame,c_tptpcol_16_35301),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query305]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X41,X42] :
( collection(X41)
| ~ disjointwith(X41,X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2620972])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_xskijump_thegame,c_tptpcol_16_35301),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X89] :
( ~ individual(X89)
| ~ collection(X89) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1365323])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ disjointwith(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_xskijump_thegame,c_tptpcol_16_35301),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
collection(c_xskijump_thegame),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
individual(c_xskijump_thegame),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1553900]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR055+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.39 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:37:45 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/125.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/125.63 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/125.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 200 seconds (1600 total)
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting new_ho_10 with 400s (2) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting sh3 with 400s (2) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 400s (2) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 400s (2) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % new_ho_10 with pid 3081996 completed with status 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.19/125.63 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/125.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 200 seconds (1600 total)
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting new_ho_10 with 400s (2) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/125.63 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/125.63 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/125.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 384 seconds (384 total)
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting new_ho_10 with 39s (1) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3082569 completed with status 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.19/125.63 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/125.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 200 seconds (1600 total)
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting new_ho_10 with 400s (2) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/125.63 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/125.63 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/125.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 384 seconds (384 total)
% 0.19/125.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 0.19/125.63 % Preprocessing time : 1.882 s
% 0.19/125.63
% 0.19/125.63 % Proof found!
% 0.19/125.63 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/125.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/125.63 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.19/125.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3324742
% 0.19/125.63 % Initial clauses : 17236
% 0.19/125.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.19/125.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17234
% 0.19/125.63 % Processed clauses : 10691
% 0.19/125.63 % ...of these trivial : 810
% 0.19/125.63 % ...subsumed : 123
% 0.19/125.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 9758
% 0.19/125.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.19/125.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.19/125.63 % Backward-rewritten : 612
% 0.19/125.63 % Generated clauses : 8909
% 0.19/125.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6314
% 0.19/125.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Paramodulations : 8908
% 0.19/125.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/125.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Total rewrite steps : 3966
% 0.19/125.63 % ...of those cached : 2391
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/125.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/125.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/125.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/125.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/125.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 9138
% 0.19/125.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6099
% 0.19/125.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1810
% 0.19/125.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 1229
% 0.19/125.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12781
% 0.19/125.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 17643
% 0.19/125.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 619
% 0.19/125.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83131
% 0.19/125.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74555
% 0.19/125.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 70
% 0.19/125.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1879949
% 0.19/125.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4093
% 0.19/125.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 616
% 0.19/125.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/125.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22651005
% 0.19/125.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10473616
% 0.19/125.63
% 0.19/125.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/125.63 % User time : 16.999 s
% 0.19/125.63 % System time : 4.886 s
% 0.19/125.63 % Total time : 21.885 s
% 0.19/125.63 % Maximum resident set size: 5020868 pages
% 0.19/125.63
% 0.19/125.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/125.63 % User time : 118.540 s
% 0.19/125.63 % System time : 10.402 s
% 0.19/125.63 % Total time : 128.942 s
% 0.19/125.63 % Maximum resident set size: 2272768 pages
% 0.19/125.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------