%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR055-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.97s 1.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 26 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 25 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ax3_41385,axiom,
ifeq4(disjointwith(X1,X2),true,collection(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_41385) ).
cnf(query205,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_xskijump_thegame,c_tptpcol_16_35301) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query205) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).
cnf(ax3_44179,axiom,
ifeq4(collection(X1),true,genls(X1,X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_44179) ).
cnf(ax3_711,axiom,
ifeq4(genls(X1,X2),true,subsetof(X1,X2),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_711) ).
cnf(ax3_29029,axiom,
ifeq4(subsetof(X1,X2),true,setorcollection(X2),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_29029) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(ax3_7665,axiom,
ifeq2(tuple2(individual(X1),setorcollection(X1)),tuple2(true,true),a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_7665) ).
cnf(ax3_7910,axiom,
individual(c_xskijump_thegame) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_7910) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_002,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_002) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
ifeq4(disjointwith(X1,X2),true,collection(X1),true) = true,
ax3_41385 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_xskijump_thegame,c_tptpcol_16_35301) = true,
query205 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
ifeq4(collection(X1),true,genls(X1,X1),true) = true,
ax3_44179 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
collection(c_xskijump_thegame) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
ifeq4(genls(X1,X2),true,subsetof(X1,X2),true) = true,
ax3_711 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_xskijump_thegame,c_xskijump_thegame) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
ifeq4(subsetof(X1,X2),true,setorcollection(X2),true) = true,
ax3_29029 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
subsetof(c_xskijump_thegame,c_xskijump_thegame) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
ifeq2(tuple2(individual(X1),setorcollection(X1)),tuple2(true,true),a,b) = b,
ax3_7665 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
setorcollection(c_xskijump_thegame) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
individual(c_xskijump_thegame) = true,
ax3_7910 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_002 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR055-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:37:27 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.97/1.78 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.97/1.78 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.97/1.78 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % sh5l with pid 3081418 completed with status 0
% 0.97/1.78 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.97/1.78 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.97/1.78 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.97/1.78 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.97/1.78 % Search class: FUUPM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.97/1.78 % partial match(1): FUUPM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.97/1.78 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3081424 completed with status 0
% 0.97/1.78 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.97/1.78 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.97/1.78 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.97/1.78 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.97/1.78 % Search class: FUUPM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.97/1.78 % partial match(1): FUUPM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.97/1.78 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.97/1.78 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.97/1.78 % Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 0.97/1.78
% 0.97/1.78 % Proof found!
% 0.97/1.78 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.97/1.78 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.97/1.79 % Parsed axioms : 44219
% 0.97/1.79 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43557
% 0.97/1.79 % Initial clauses : 662
% 0.97/1.79 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Initial clauses in saturation : 662
% 0.97/1.79 % Processed clauses : 1551
% 0.97/1.79 % ...of these trivial : 279
% 0.97/1.79 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % ...remaining for further processing : 1272
% 0.97/1.79 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Generated clauses : 4277
% 0.97/1.79 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2519
% 0.97/1.79 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Paramodulations : 4277
% 0.97/1.79 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % NegExts : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Total rewrite steps : 3916
% 0.97/1.79 % ...of those cached : 2470
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.97/1.79 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.97/1.79 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.97/1.79 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.97/1.79 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.97/1.79 % Current number of processed clauses : 1272
% 0.97/1.79 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1271
% 0.97/1.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.97/1.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1608
% 0.97/1.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 1608
% 0.97/1.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 683
% 0.97/1.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.97/1.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 399771
% 0.97/1.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 124808
% 0.97/1.79
% 0.97/1.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.97/1.79 % User time : 0.295 s
% 0.97/1.79 % System time : 0.196 s
% 0.97/1.79 % Total time : 0.491 s
% 0.97/1.79 % Maximum resident set size: 80920 pages
% 0.97/1.79
% 0.97/1.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.97/1.79 % User time : 1.043 s
% 0.97/1.79 % System time : 0.238 s
% 0.97/1.79 % Total time : 1.281 s
% 0.97/1.79 % Maximum resident set size: 34560 pages
% 0.97/1.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------