↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR056+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR056+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 22:14:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS derived 75 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 87 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS allocated 97736 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 18 :
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)*.
% 0.18/0.44  10[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.18/0.44  13[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,u)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  15[0:Inp] artsupplies(u) ||  -> supplies(u)*.
% 0.18/0.44  16[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)*.
% 0.18/0.44  57[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.18/0.44  58[0:Inp] supplies(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_14(n_232))*.
% 0.18/0.44  66[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.18/0.44  71[0:Res:1.0,57.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,u) -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.18/0.44  72[0:Res:58.2,13.0] supplies(c_tptpartsupplies) || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  102[0:SoR:72.0,15.1] artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  103[0:SoR:102.0,16.1] || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  126[0:Res:71.1,103.1] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_cyclistsmt) mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  173[0:Res:71.1,126.1] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt) genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_cyclistsmt)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  174[0:MRR:173.0,11.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_cyclistsmt)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  175[0:NCh:66.2,66.1,174.0,10.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  176[0:MRR:175.0,11.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : query56 just8 just9 just2 just12 just47 just10 just52
% 0.18/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------