%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR056+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.30s 0.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 50 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 1 sgn 9 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query156,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query156) ).
fof(ax2_842,axiom,
! [X2] :
( ( supplies(X2)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) )
=> tptpofobject(X2,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_842) ).
fof(ax2_1480,axiom,
! [X1] :
( artsupplies(X1)
=> supplies(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1480) ).
fof(ax2_1986,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1986) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( genlmt(X21,X22)
& mtvisible(X21) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_856,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_856) ).
fof(ax2_4288,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_4288) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X23) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query156]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X31] :
( tptpofobject(X31,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
| ~ supplies(X31)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_842])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X24)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ supplies(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X62] :
( supplies(X62)
| ~ artsupplies(X62) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1480])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1986])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ supplies(X1)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ artsupplies(X1)
| supplies(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X29,X30] :
( mtvisible(X30)
| ~ genlmt(X29,X30)
| ~ mtvisible(X29) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ supplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| supplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_856]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_4288]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR056+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:38:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/0.72 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.30/0.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % sh5l with pid 124648 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.30/0.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.30/0.72 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.30/0.72 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.72 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.72 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % SubtermCWHack with pid 124653 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.30/0.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.30/0.72 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.30/0.72 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.72 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.72 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/0.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.72 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.30/0.72
% 0.30/0.72 % Proof found!
% 0.30/0.72 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/0.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/0.72 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.30/0.72 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7287
% 0.30/0.72 % Initial clauses : 720
% 0.30/0.72 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Initial clauses in saturation : 720
% 0.30/0.72 % Processed clauses : 1000
% 0.30/0.72 % ...of these trivial : 102
% 0.30/0.72 % ...subsumed : 63
% 0.30/0.72 % ...remaining for further processing : 834
% 0.30/0.72 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.30/0.72 % Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.30/0.72 % Generated clauses : 1212
% 0.30/0.72 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 820
% 0.30/0.72 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Paramodulations : 1212
% 0.30/0.72 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % NegExts : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Total rewrite steps : 459
% 0.30/0.72 % ...of those cached : 251
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.72 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.72 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.72 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.72 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.72 % Current number of processed clauses : 819
% 0.30/0.72 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 476
% 0.30/0.72 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Negative unit clauses : 53
% 0.30/0.72 % Non-unit-clauses : 290
% 0.30/0.72 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 535
% 0.30/0.72 % ...number of literals in the above : 918
% 0.30/0.72 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.30/0.72 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10765
% 0.30/0.72 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10139
% 0.30/0.72 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 63
% 0.30/0.72 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3969
% 0.30/0.72 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.30/0.72 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.30/0.72 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/0.72 % Termbank termtop insertions : 88229
% 0.30/0.72 % Search garbage collected termcells : 32021
% 0.30/0.72
% 0.30/0.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.72 % User time : 0.092 s
% 0.30/0.72 % System time : 0.048 s
% 0.30/0.72 % Total time : 0.140 s
% 0.30/0.72 % Maximum resident set size: 20596 pages
% 0.30/0.72
% 0.30/0.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.72 % User time : 0.214 s
% 0.30/0.72 % System time : 0.062 s
% 0.30/0.72 % Total time : 0.276 s
% 0.30/0.72 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 0.30/0.72 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------