%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR057+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 5.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 17 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query107,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X13,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query107) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
& mtvisible(X20) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_462,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geolevel_4(X1)
=> geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_462) ).
fof(ax1_464,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_464) ).
fof(ax1_1,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_326) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_1042,axiom,
! [X13] :
( geographicalregion(X13)
=> geographicalsubregions(X13,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1042) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X13,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query107]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X33,X34] :
( mtvisible(X34)
| ~ genlmt(X33,X34)
| ~ mtvisible(X33) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( ~ inregion(X22,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X47] :
( geographicalregion(X47)
| ~ geolevel_4(X47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_462])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_464])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ geolevel_4(X1)
| geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( inregion(X24,X23)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X23,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X42] :
( geographicalsubregions(X42,X42)
| ~ geographicalregion(X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1042])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ geographicalregion(X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR057+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.37 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:33:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % new_bool_3 with pid 2559831 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/5.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.47 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2559834 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.47 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.15/5.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/5.47
% 0.15/5.47 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/5.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.47 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.15/5.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1100
% 0.15/5.47 % Initial clauses : 33
% 0.15/5.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.15/5.47 % Processed clauses : 40
% 0.15/5.47 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.15/5.47 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.15/5.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.15/5.47 % Generated clauses : 13
% 0.15/5.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.15/5.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Paramodulations : 13
% 0.15/5.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.15/5.47 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 36
% 0.15/5.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.15/5.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/5.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.15/5.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.15/5.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 13
% 0.15/5.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.15/5.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46
% 0.15/5.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.15/5.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.15/5.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/5.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/5.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8832
% 0.15/5.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4939
% 0.15/5.47
% 0.15/5.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.47 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/5.47 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/5.47 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/5.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.15/5.47
% 0.15/5.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.47 % User time : 0.032 s
% 0.15/5.47 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/5.47 % Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.15/5.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.15/5.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------