↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : CSR057+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:06:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.11s 1.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  15   ~;  10   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   4 sgn   9   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
    ! [ARG1,ARG2] :
      ( geographicalsubregions(ARG1,ARG2)
     => inregion(ARG2,ARG1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_128) ).

fof(ax1_462,axiom,
    ! [OBJ] :
      ( geolevel_4(OBJ)
     => geographicalregion(OBJ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_462) ).

fof(ax1_464,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
   => geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_464) ).

fof(ax1_932,axiom,
    ! [INS,ARG2] :
      ( inregion(INS,ARG2)
     => spatialthing_nonsituational(INS) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_932) ).

fof(ax1_934,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( spatialthing_nonsituational(X)
     => inregion(X,X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_934) ).

fof(ax1_1042,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( geographicalregion(X)
     => geographicalsubregions(X,X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_1042) ).

fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
    ! [SPECMT,GENLMT] :
      ( ( genlmt(SPECMT,GENLMT)
        & mtvisible(SPECMT) )
     => mtvisible(GENLMT) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_1123) ).

fof(query107,conjecture,
    ? [X] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
     => inregion(X,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',query107) ).

fof(query107_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
       => inregion(X,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query107]) ).

fof(ax1_1,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_1) ).

cnf(c_1232,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_1]) ).

cnf(c_1311,plain,
    ( inregion(B,A)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_128]) ).

fof(ax1_326,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1_326) ).

cnf(c_1435,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).

cnf(c_1523,plain,
    ( geographicalregion(A)
    | ~ geolevel_4(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_462]) ).

cnf(c_1524,plain,
    ( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_464]) ).

cnf(c_1825,plain,
    ( spatialthing_nonsituational(A)
    | ~ inregion(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_932]) ).

cnf(c_1827,plain,
    ( inregion(A,A)
    | ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_934]) ).

cnf(c_1912,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(A,A)
    | ~ geographicalregion(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_1042]) ).

cnf(c_1957,plain,
    ( mtvisible(B)
    | ~ genlmt(A,B)
    | ~ mtvisible(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123]) ).

cnf(c_1962,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[query107_neg]) ).

cnf(c_1963,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(A,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[query107_neg]) ).

cnf(c_1973,plain,
    ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1827,c_1963]) ).

cnf(c_1974,plain,
    ~ inregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1973,c_1825]) ).

cnf(c_1981,plain,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(A,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1311,c_1974]) ).

cnf(c_2312,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1957,c_1232]) ).

cnf(c_1983,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1962,c_2312]) ).

cnf(c_2313,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1435,c_1957]) ).

cnf(c_2238,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1983,c_2313]) ).

cnf(c_2241,plain,
    geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2238,c_1524]) ).

cnf(c_2277,plain,
    geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1523,c_2241]) ).

cnf(c_2314,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1912,c_2277]) ).

cnf(c_2311,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1981,c_2314]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR057+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 00:28:32 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.39  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.39  % Process 1095927 was started by sandbox on n015,
% 0.10/0.39  % Sun Sep 27 00:28:32 2026
% 0.10/0.39  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % SInE: 756 to sos, 375 to usable, of 1131 axioms (tolerance 2.00, depth 0 fixpoint).
% 3.11/1.13  
% 3.11/1.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.11/1.13  
% 3.11/1.13  % Proof 1 at 0.36 (+ 0.06) seconds.
% 3.11/1.13  % Length of proof is 27.
% 3.11/1.13  % Level of proof is 6.
% 3.11/1.13  % Maximum clause weight is 110.000.
% 3.11/1.13  % Given clauses 218.
% 3.11/1.13  
% 3.11/1.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------