%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR057+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.01s 6.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 1 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query207,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query207) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_43404,axiom,
! [X16] :
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X16)
=> inregion(X16,X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43404) ).
fof(ax3_2801,axiom,
! [X1] :
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
=> spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_2801) ).
fof(ax3_3986,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geolevel_4(X1)
=> geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_3986) ).
fof(ax3_1625,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1625) ).
fof(ax3_4591,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4591) ).
fof(ax3_27702,axiom,
! [X1] :
( partiallytangible(X1)
=> enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_27702) ).
fof(ax3_1936,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geographicalregion(X1)
=> partiallytangible(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1936) ).
fof(ax3_11699,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11699) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query207]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( mtvisible(X38)
| ~ genlmt(X37,X38)
| ~ mtvisible(X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ inregion(X24,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X36] :
( inregion(X36,X36)
| ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X36) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43404])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X47] :
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X47)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_2801])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X52] :
( geographicalregion(X52)
| ~ geolevel_4(X52) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3986])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1625])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4591]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| inregion(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ enduringthing_localized(X1)
| spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X66] :
( enduringthing_localized(X66)
| ~ partiallytangible(X66) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_27702])])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X59] :
( partiallytangible(X59)
| ~ geographicalregion(X59) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1936])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ geolevel_4(X1)
| geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_11699]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ enduringthing_localized(X1)
| inregion(X1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ partiallytangible(X1)
| enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ geographicalregion(X1)
| partiallytangible(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ enduringthing_localized(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ geographicalregion(X1)
| enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR057+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.39 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:38:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.01/6.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.01/6.54 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.01/6.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % new_bool_1 with pid 3746083 completed with status 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.01/6.54 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.01/6.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.01/6.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.01/6.54 % Search class: FHUNS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.01/6.54 % partial match(2): FGUSS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.01/6.54 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3746085 completed with status 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.01/6.54 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.01/6.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.01/6.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.01/6.54 % Search class: FHUNS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.01/6.54 % partial match(2): FGUSS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.01/6.54 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.01/6.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 2.01/6.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 2.01/6.54
% 2.01/6.54 % Proof found!
% 2.01/6.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.01/6.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.01/6.54 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 2.01/6.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44146
% 2.01/6.54 % Initial clauses : 72
% 2.01/6.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 2.01/6.54 % Processed clauses : 85
% 2.01/6.54 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 2.01/6.54 % ...subsumed : 5
% 2.01/6.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 66
% 2.01/6.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 2.01/6.54 % Generated clauses : 39
% 2.01/6.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 2.01/6.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Paramodulations : 39
% 2.01/6.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % NegExts : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Total rewrite steps : 30
% 2.01/6.54 % ...of those cached : 17
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.01/6.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.01/6.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.01/6.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.01/6.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.01/6.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 64
% 2.01/6.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 2.01/6.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 2.01/6.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 2.01/6.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 2.01/6.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 26
% 2.01/6.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 2.01/6.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 178
% 2.01/6.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 160
% 2.01/6.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 2.01/6.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 2.01/6.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 2.01/6.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 2.01/6.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.01/6.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 294478
% 2.01/6.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157780
% 2.01/6.54
% 2.01/6.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.01/6.54 % User time : 0.164 s
% 2.01/6.54 % System time : 0.119 s
% 2.01/6.54 % Total time : 0.283 s
% 2.01/6.54 % Maximum resident set size: 84020 pages
% 2.01/6.54
% 2.01/6.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.01/6.54 % User time : 0.886 s
% 2.01/6.54 % System time : 0.177 s
% 2.01/6.54 % Total time : 1.063 s
% 2.01/6.54 % Maximum resident set size: 37632 pages
% 2.01/6.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------