%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR057+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 115.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query307,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query307) ).
fof(ax5_1758052,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1758052) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query307]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1758052])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X34] :
( ~ inregion(X34,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR057+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:43:55 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/115.72 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/115.72 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/115.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 206 seconds (1648 total)
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting new_ho_10 with 412s (2) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting sh3 with 412s (2) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 412s (2) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 412s (2) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % new_ho_10 with pid 2679024 completed with status 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.16/115.72 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/115.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 206 seconds (1648 total)
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting new_ho_10 with 412s (2) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/115.72 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/115.72 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/115.72 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 397 seconds (397 total)
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 36s (1) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting new_ho_10 with 40s (1) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % new_ho_10 with pid 2679029 completed with status 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.16/115.72 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/115.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 206 seconds (1648 total)
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting new_ho_10 with 412s (2) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/115.72 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/115.72 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/115.72 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 397 seconds (397 total)
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 36s (1) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % Starting new_ho_10 with 40s (1) cores
% 0.16/115.72 % Preprocessing time : 1.822 s
% 0.16/115.72 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/115.72
% 0.16/115.72 % Proof found!
% 0.16/115.72 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/115.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/115.72 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.16/115.72 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3333106
% 0.16/115.72 % Initial clauses : 8873
% 0.16/115.72 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.16/115.72 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8871
% 0.16/115.72 % Processed clauses : 27
% 0.16/115.72 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.16/115.72 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.16/115.72 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/115.72 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/115.72 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/115.72 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/115.72 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/115.72 % Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.16/115.72 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.16/115.72 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.16/115.72 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8844
% 0.16/115.72 % ...number of literals in the above : 12034
% 0.16/115.72 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 91
% 0.16/115.72 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Condensation attempts : 27
% 0.16/115.72 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/115.72 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22303457
% 0.16/115.72 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10484573
% 0.16/115.72
% 0.16/115.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/115.72 % User time : 14.086 s
% 0.16/115.72 % System time : 3.815 s
% 0.16/115.72 % Total time : 17.901 s
% 0.16/115.72 % Maximum resident set size: 5019588 pages
% 0.16/115.72
% 0.16/115.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/115.72 % User time : 106.906 s
% 0.16/115.72 % System time : 8.514 s
% 0.16/115.72 % Total time : 115.420 s
% 0.16/115.72 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.16/115.72 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------