%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR058+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.27s 1.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query158,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query158) ).
fof(ax2_408,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroriststhathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_408) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X15) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query158]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroriststhathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization)
| ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_408])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X5993] :
( ~ prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X5993)
& mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt)
| prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroriststhathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_englishmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR058+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:11 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.27/1.07 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.27/1.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.27/1.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 2164135 completed with status 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 2.27/1.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.27/1.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.27/1.07 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.27/1.07 % Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.27/1.07 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 901s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting new_bool_1 with 146s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % new_bool_1 with pid 2164168 completed with status 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.27/1.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.27/1.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.27/1.07 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.27/1.07 % Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.27/1.07 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 901s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Starting new_bool_1 with 146s (1) cores
% 2.27/1.07 % Preprocessing time : 0.078 s
% 2.27/1.07 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.27/1.07
% 2.27/1.07 % Proof found!
% 2.27/1.07 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.27/1.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.27/1.07 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 2.27/1.07 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Initial clauses : 8007
% 2.27/1.07 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8007
% 2.27/1.07 % Processed clauses : 15
% 2.27/1.07 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % ...subsumed : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 2.27/1.07 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Generated clauses : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Paramodulations : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % NegExts : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 2.27/1.07 % ...of those cached : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.27/1.07 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.27/1.07 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.27/1.07 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.27/1.07 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.27/1.07 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 2.27/1.07 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 2.27/1.07 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 2.27/1.07 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7992
% 2.27/1.07 % ...number of literals in the above : 13020
% 2.27/1.07 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 2.27/1.07 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.27/1.07 % Termbank termtop insertions : 334535
% 2.27/1.07 % Search garbage collected termcells : 41054
% 2.27/1.07
% 2.27/1.07 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.27/1.07 % User time : 0.422 s
% 2.27/1.07 % System time : 0.043 s
% 2.27/1.07 % Total time : 0.465 s
% 2.27/1.07 % Maximum resident set size: 24128 pages
% 2.27/1.07
% 2.27/1.07 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.27/1.07 % User time : 0.820 s
% 2.27/1.07 % System time : 0.175 s
% 2.27/1.07 % Total time : 0.996 s
% 2.27/1.07 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 2.27/1.07 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------