↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR058-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 67.41s 30.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 67.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (  14 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ax3_1585,axiom,
    ifeq4(mtvisible(c_englishmt),true,prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroriststhathasbeenamemberofaterroristgroup),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_1585) ).

cnf(query208,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_englishmt) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query208) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
    ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
    a != b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

cnf(query208_1,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq3(prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X1),true,a,b) = b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query208_1) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
    ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ifeq4(mtvisible(c_englishmt),true,prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroriststhathasbeenamemberofaterroristgroup),true) = true,
    ax3_1585 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_englishmt) = true,
    query208 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    a != b,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq3(prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X1),true,a,b) = b,
    query208_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroriststhathasbeenamemberofaterroristgroup) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom_001 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    a != b,
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR058-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:41:44 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 67.41/30.52  % Version: 3.5.1
% 67.41/30.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 67.41/30.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % new_bool_1 with pid 2147451 completed with status 9
% 67.41/30.52  % new_bool_3 with pid 2147450 completed with status 9
% 67.41/30.52  % sh5l with pid 2147452 completed with status 9
% 67.41/30.52  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 2147453 completed with status 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 67.41/30.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 67.41/30.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 67.41/30.52  % No SInE strategy applied
% 67.41/30.52  % Search class: FUUPM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 67.41/30.52  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2147473 completed with status 8
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 31s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 2147661 completed with status 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 67.41/30.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 67.41/30.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 67.41/30.52  % No SInE strategy applied
% 67.41/30.52  % Search class: FUUPM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 67.41/30.52  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2147473 completed with status 8
% 67.41/30.52  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 31s (1) cores
% 67.41/30.52  % Preprocessing time       : 0.729 s
% 67.41/30.52  
% 67.41/30.52  % Proof found!
% 67.41/30.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 67.41/30.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 67.41/30.52  % Parsed axioms                        : 44220
% 67.41/30.52  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Initial clauses                      : 44220
% 67.41/30.52  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 44220
% 67.41/30.52  % Processed clauses                    : 2097
% 67.41/30.52  % ...of these trivial                  : 118
% 67.41/30.52  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1979
% 67.41/30.52  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Backward-rewritten                   : 33
% 67.41/30.52  % Generated clauses                    : 3
% 67.41/30.52  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 67.41/30.52  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Paramodulations                      : 3
% 67.41/30.52  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % NegExts                              : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Total rewrite steps                  : 157
% 67.41/30.52  % ...of those cached                   : 3
% 67.41/30.52  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 67.41/30.52  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 67.41/30.52  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 67.41/30.52  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 67.41/30.52  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 67.41/30.52  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1946
% 67.41/30.52  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1945
% 67.41/30.52  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 67.41/30.52  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 67.41/30.52  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42123
% 67.41/30.52  % ...number of literals in the above   : 42123
% 67.41/30.52  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Current number of archived clauses   : 33
% 67.41/30.52  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 36
% 67.41/30.52  % BW rewrite match successes           : 33
% 67.41/30.52  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 67.41/30.52  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 674068
% 67.41/30.52  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 67.41/30.52  
% 67.41/30.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 67.41/30.52  % User time                : 25.761 s
% 67.41/30.52  % System time              : 3.917 s
% 67.41/30.52  % Total time               : 29.678 s
% 67.41/30.52  % Maximum resident set size: 68380 pages
% 67.41/30.52  
% 67.41/30.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 67.41/30.52  % User time                : 61.027 s
% 67.41/30.52  % System time              : 7.083 s
% 67.41/30.52  % Total time               : 68.110 s
% 67.41/30.52  % Maximum resident set size: 34304 pages
% 67.41/30.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------